B2B Sales

The Agentic Revolution: AI In Professional Sales With David Fauser & Mike Sparling

The Selling Well Podcast | David Fauser & Mike Sparling | AI In Professional Sales

Artificial intelligence is rapidly shifting from a futuristic concept into an essential driver of efficiency, strategy, and hyper-personalized customer engagement. Successfully integrating AI in professional sales requires leaders and teams to look beyond the hype and embed intelligent tools directly into daily workflows. In this episode, host Mark Cox is joined by David Fauser, Vice President of Sales, Marketing, and Strategy at CIMCO Refrigeration Inc., and Mike Sparling, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer at Multi-Health Systems Inc. Together, they explore how top-performing sales organizations deploy AI agents to eliminate low-value tasks, elevate relationship selling, and orchestrate hybrid workforces. Discover how sales leaders can move past temporary pilots, build intentional AI strategies, and leverage technology to deliver unmatched value to clients.

—-

Watch the Episode here

Listen to the Podcast here


The Agentic Revolution: AI In Professional Sales With David Fauser & Mike Sparling

Meet The Experts: Navigating AI In B2B Sales

You’re in for a great show because we’ve got both David Fauser and Mike Sparling joining the show. These are a couple of our favorites in the funnel. Some of you know Mike because Mike has been our AI sherpa for the last number of episodes. David Fauser runs a massive sales organization for CIMCO Refrigeration with 150-some odd people. He's been a friend of the show. If you look into some of the past episodes, we've interviewed David. David has been a guest host, helping me interview some of our great guests.

With these two real thought leaders, we have a great open conversation about AI. At a high level, we cover four topics. One is what's going on with AI and professional sales. Somebody running a sales organization North of 125 people has a good line of sight in terms of how we're leveraging AI for productivity, efficiency, and a lot of those things.

We talk a little bit about where AI is going and what we're going to need to enable our teams in the future. Mike is super helpful for that conversation. We're talking about AI and the implications for salespeople. What are we all dealing with, trying to stay current with these technologies? There's that implication or opportunity for sales leadership.

Any opportunity you get to chat with people like this is a real pleasure for me, for sure, and a great learning opportunity for me. I hope it's the same for you. If you liked this episode with David Fauser and Mike Sparling, please like and subscribe to the show. Tell your friends because the more folks who do that, that's how we get great guests like Mike and David. I enjoyed chatting with these guys. I hope you enjoyed this conversation, too. Here it comes.

The Selling Well Podcast | David Fauser & Mike Sparling | AI In Professional Sales

Welcome to another great episode of the show. David Fauser and Mike Sparling, welcome to the show again.

Thank you, Mark. Glad to be back.

Glad to be here.

I was pretty excited for this. We've got two of our favorites here. It's great to have you both back. Maybe we'll get the short story intro from both of you, if you wouldn't mind, starting with you, David Fauser.

Thank you, Mark. I'm super happy to be back again. This is a great topic. It’s very front of mind. I'm the Vice President of Sales, Marketing, and Strategy for CIMCO. With CIMCO, if you would have read and learned to love selling, you'd learn about our value proposition. We built half of the world's hockey rinks.

We do engineering, design, manufacturing, and installation and servicing of complex, customized refrigeration and thermal systems for all sorts of different industries. We're located across North America. We're North America's largest refrigeration organization. We have about 130 salespeople who sell projects and service as well. AI is something that's interesting to us. I look forward to sharing a few things about what we're thinking with your audience.

Huge sales organization. Huge opportunity for David when we think of the sales organization player-coaches. They service, and they're supposed to grow tricky business, for sure. Thanks, David. It's great to have you here. Michael Sparling.

I could claim that one of the things I'm trying to do is sit in every one of those hockey arenas and see a game that David built. I'm the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer for a neurosciences company with global reach and lots of things there. My claim to fame is that I've spent 30 years, a little more, in my career always working in AI. It’s usually not called that. It's only in the last few years that it has been fashionable to say you work in AI.

I've been through industrial process control. I've been through search. I've been through customer evaluation. I've been through behavior change. I had a good stint in academia. I’m working on the intersection between our organic minds and the digital mind, and what we can do with that. Having a great time co-hosting with Mark here on the show for this time.

Also, doing a great job. We're so happy to have you, Mike. Gentlemen, thanks for joining the show. This is one of the things I thought might be a helpful structure for our conversation, but we can always go down tangents. I thought about first talking about what we are seeing out there with AI. What are sales organizations doing with AI as of the recording of this episode in 2026? I'd like to talk a little bit about the future and where we see this going in 3 to 5 years.

I would like to talk about the implications for our people. Those teams, David, that you've got in the field. Mike, as the CEO, you had many teams in the field. What are we seeing on the sales teams out there? What are the implications for the people we put on the sales team? Does this change the profile of the professional salesperson moving forward?

Finally, how does this impact us as leaders? We get a lot of folks tuning in to the show who are sales leaders. I'm pretty sure many of them are confused. At some points in time, I'm pretty confused as to what we should be doing, where we should be investing, and how we recommend or consult with our clients. If that's okay with you both, let's jump in here. Question one. I'm going to start with you, David, and then I'm going to go over to Mike. If we look beyond the hype, what are sales teams doing with AI? How are they creating measurable business value for their clients or for their own organizations with AI?

Beyond The Hype: What Sales Teams Are Doing With AI Today

A lot of different things are happening, but I'll think more best in class. If I'm thinking about what best-in-class sellers are doing, if their company doesn't have an overall AI strategy, they're certainly using the tools that are available through ChatGPT, Claude, or Copilot and are looking for ways to make themselves more efficient. That would be something that I see the seller would be doing. That could be through researching before they make a call. It could be doing some roleplaying, potentially. Developing questions, finding out more about the company, etc.

There’s a certain level, which I would consider to be really table stakes at this point. If you're not doing that as a seller, you're disadvantaged because it is so incredibly easy to do. Organizations are looking at agents that, first of all, can help individuals, but also sit on different platforms, like your CRM, for example. Good organizations that are on top of AI from where you could get value would be looking at ways to make their sellers more efficient by taking away their low-value tasks and trying to replace those with high-value tasks.

The Selling Well Podcast | David Fauser & Mike Sparling | AI In Professional Sales

AI In Professional Sales: Good organizations would be looking at ways to make their sellers more efficient by taking away their low value tasks and trying to replace those with high value tasks.

We could be in the dawn of the relationship seller again. I know that never went away, Mark, but it's always, “I’m too busy.” There's a stock market ticker. They are shooting up in value like you wouldn't believe. The responders better be worried because those guys are going to be in trouble. Those are a couple of things, Mark, that are very high-level that I'm seeing. One is efficiency in the drive of trying to take away some of those low-level activities.

Thanks, David. What would you add to that, Mike? What's your view?

Great answer, David. You see across the spectrum. There are companies from very early adoption that are beginning to be AI-adjacent. They're looking at, “How can I do some basic things?” as David highlighted. Some prompts and some other pieces there. It goes all the way to companies that have restructured thoroughly, and they're very AI-forward. They're led by AI in support of their people. They’re allowing their salespeople to be more relationship-based.

We were having a conversation in one of our earlier recordings where we really honed in on this triumph where you can say personalization, long-term memory, and pattern matching drive everything that would go into the return of relationship selling. AI's ability to reason over large sets of data and find patterns that may not be evident to us or would only be evident to someone at a very high level of awareness and understanding, is surfacing those patterns to different parts of the workforce.

The memory, remembering what has happened through the whole relationship from prospect to repeat customer. The most exciting piece to me is the level of hyper-personalization the generative technologies let us take on, whether that's specific content tuned to a voice or an outcome, or a media placement piece. I don't want to imagine AI phoning and making phone pitches, but that is still the place that we're at. It is hyper-personalized. David gets a very different offer than Mark, and yet we're all being guided to the same set of goals and outcomes.

I love that hyper personalization. Mike, you know they are using AI. Think of professional services firms like a chiropractor or a dentist. Think of those organizations. There are some platforms out there that'll reach out with calls, confirm your appointment, and maybe book you for another appointment. With the conversations we’re having, Mike, we're seeing things like basic prospect research, account planning, and proposal development.

More sophisticated would be, “Can I help with data enrichment or identifying my ideal client profile by dumping all of our clients and what we've done for them? Can they help me find new clients or target markets or prioritize the messaging to them?” A lot of those data enrichment tools leverage AI for outreach.

I don't want to get too tool-specific because it'll be outdated by the time we publish this episode. They're using those tools to try and personalize outreach, so that we can get people engaged on the top end. The jury is still out. Email outreach still has a low return generally, but it's one of the highest marketing returns out there. Even though it's low, it's still one of the highest marketing returns out there. If we fast-forward this thing five years, where do we see it going?

Maybe I'll throw this one, Mike, if I can ask you first, because I know you're a proponent that things have changed dramatically in the last couple of months. You've seen some triggers for that that I love to hear about. Anybody reading this will agree with you because it has blown up in the last couple of months in terms of everything out there on the hype cycle about AI. What's happening that's causing that, in your view? Where's it going to be a few years from now? How do you think things will change? How will we, as organizations, be using AI to compete and win in the market?

The Rise Of AI Agents And The Future Of Work

What's that famous saying? The danger of predicting the future is you’re right sometimes. I look at the pace. The pace has changed. It used to be the frontier model companies. An OpenAI, an Anthropic, a Microsoft, or whoever would rev a model once a year. When we first started out, GPT came out with 3.0. 3.5 came about a year later. That was time for us to learn and figure out the confusing pieces of the whole puzzle and make it work.

We’re now getting major model releases every 30 days. Every one of those models breaks all of the past records, the benchmarks, and all of the things there. That pace of change is driven by a bunch of things. The availability of compute has continued to grow. Not in my backyard. You don't want a data center there. There are massive amounts of data capacity coming online to allow these models to scale new training techniques and new ways that they develop their skills and abilities.

The biggest thing in the last couple of months is the emergence of agents. David, you referenced that in your opening piece, too. Agents change the equation. A prompt is when you author something and hand it across to a machine that has no recollection and no memory. Everything that comes as a response to that prompt, you've had to type into the keyboard at that moment. Agents operate over time with memory, goals, objectives, and access to tools. This longevity, tool access, and goal setting let us point those agents at much more complex problems.

Agents operate over time with memory, goals, objectives, and access to tools, letting us point those agents at much more complex problems.

If I look out five years, cooperative workforces, agents, and individuals will manage our organizations from a hybrid org chart. We'll have agentic behaviors and organic behaviors. I always hate saying humans are organic. We'll look at our org charts and see agentic capabilities along with our traditional staff. We'll set goals for both sets of outcomes.

We'll see embodied AI as well in the next five years. Robots or purpose-built interfaces will engage with us, be they particular things in shopping experiences or different ways that are cognitive extensions in how our phones behave with us based on AI. That agentic intersection will change almost everything for us. That's a lot of ways to say I have no idea what it's going to look like, but some of the trends to me are a much richer co-intelligence where we're working together on outcomes and seeing that happen around the clock.

David? What are your thoughts on that same question? Where are we going with this? Even another question. How does what Mike said make you feel?

It makes me feel exactly how I have been feeling since January 1st, 2026. I've been immersed in how AI is going to be affecting us now and into the future. As a leader, Mark, it's super challenging. Our managers’ meetings were all about that. We're trying to figure out where we invest, how we invest, and where we put our bets on the table. For every good AI opportunity, there are probably five bad AI opportunities. You could probably cause a lot more confusion if you don't put it in very deliberately.

Where I think the future's headed, though, for selling, is going to be completely different. Even the size of our salesforce is going to be smaller. I'm sure there'll be other roles, but I think that it'll be smaller. All organizations better get their value proposition highly figured out because the sophistication on the buyer side is going to outpace us because we used to have information.

We talk about the internet age. Before the internet, we had a lot more information on sellers. We're going to have even less. That knowledge used to be valuable in certain circumstances. We won't be able to lean back on that value as our main source of finding and keeping customers. The bar is going to be higher in regard to what we're offering in regard to how we find and keep customers and opportunities. That's going to be challenging, for sure, but in the midst of difficulty lies opportunities. The opportunities will be for our ability to get faster, better, smarter.

For the first time in human history, there's something that's smarter than us that's available at our fingertips. What can we do with that power? What can we do to make things better and enhance our value proposition? For all those reasons, it is hard for me to say what's going to look like with robots and this and that. I do know that with these agents, Mark, I've got an unlimited workforce.

Mike speaks to that, too.

I can deploy these guys like crazy. Productivity can go through the roof for training and for sorts of interesting things. One other thought on this, Mark, is that if you do not have an AI strategy in place right now or you don't think you're going to, you're probably going to be out of business, to be quite frank with you. I don't know how you would compete otherwise. Those are my thoughts on that, Mark.

It leads to a couple of thoughts. With loving kindness to everybody out there, for a lot of years, there was this role of revenue operations or sales enablement. Call it what you will. In different companies, based on the sophistication of the sales organization, it was a mid-level, prestigious position. Maybe sometimes, not always. You had folks in there who maybe hadn't come from a sales organization. They were doing policing on reporting and all of this kind of stuff in Salesforce.

To me, all of this turns that role into this incredibly strategic role for a sales organization. If we look at what a sales leader has to do, they have to build the strategy, build the team, enable the team, and lead the team. Enabling the team became massively important through AI because AI is going to enable the team.

The agent is a person, Mark. Enablement was one person with a bunch of salespeople. Now, it's a bunch of enablers, agents almost, with one salesperson. The salesperson will never have more support than what it's going to have in all aspects of enablement.

What does that turn the salesperson into, then, Mike?

It turns everyone into an orchestrator, understanding the company policies, goals, and objectives. Governance is going to be more important. More people in the organization will have to think in governance and compliance terminology, even while the guardrails and frameworks have to enforce it. When you're orchestrating agents, you're going to need to understand more.

Rethinking Sales Leadership, Enablement, And Orchestration

What are they empowered to do? Where are you required? I was saying human in the loop. There'll always be a human in every decision loop. We already see that 60% to 70% of a lot of agent deployments operate autonomously until they meet a threshold where they escalate and someone else is involved. It takes a deep understanding of the process.

One of the things about learning to love selling is that it calls out through the frameworks that are required in order to affect the outcome of the sale. That framework then is able to be annotated with guardrails and conditions to say, “If it goes on this path, I don't need to be involved. I’ll look at the deal at the end and be happy with it.” These are the points of escalation where you have to see my input or, to David's point, another agent who works at a higher level, who has a different budget, allocation, or capability. That orchestration piece is what is key.

A lot of people's job titles over the next five years will change to include words like orchestration or articulation. We're building agents, not a computer science problem. It's a business articulation goal-setting problem. That's going to empower a lot of people, but require some things that maybe organizations didn't use to teach to be key skills that we develop in our staff.

It's now a business articulation goal setting problem. That's going to empower a lot of people.

What a great way of thinking about it. David, I'll build on that point that you brought up at the beginning, saying, “The core elements of a playbook, whether it's ours or somebody else's, are still there.” Before I start to scale something like outreach, I do need to understand my value proposition to a market. You're saying the buyers are doing lots of scanning as well.

With love to everybody out there, many times, organizations still have a very difficult time articulating their value proposition to a marketplace. What do you do? How does what you do tie to a desired outcome for your client? What makes you unique and different from their other options in the marketplace to achieve that outcome, including doing nothing and keeping doing what they're doing?

That question that we posed when we're consulting and training the sales team continues to perplex them. We've all been so accustomed. We have so much motor memory to regurgitate marketing bumb, which is meaningless, including my company. We got embarrassed in a large workshop once where somebody said, “We're doing the value proposition exercise.”

We were speaking at an event for Deloitte. There were 100 people in a room, and we were training them on value proposition. They said, “Explain your value proposition.” I had a very confident salesperson from our team at the event. I said, “I can do it, but I'm going to pass it over to this fellow.” I threw him in the deep end.

He became a little uncomfortable, and then he regurgitated and said, “In the Funnel is a group of sales coaches and consultants that help companies sell better. Clients engage us when the sales team is dramatically underperforming.” He went on to say, “We're unique and different because of A, B, C, and D.” Half the hands of the room went up and said, “Our sales team's killing it. We're here because we want to keep getting better. We're not underperforming. That's the wrong value proposition.”

This poor salesperson, who will remain nameless, and I were both pretty embarrassed because it woke me up that. Although that was a value proposition five years prior when we started, we'd evolved and had become different. We were selling to different clients. The clients weren't in pain. They wanted to keep doing well. It’s this challenge around articulating the value proposition and then understanding your ideal client profile. I don't want to scale outreach. I don't want agents doing anything unless I understand that I've done the hard work of refining those two things. Would you agree, David?

Yes, 100%. Your fundamentals, especially in the level of selling, are where it's at not only for sellers, but for organizations. One of the things that I'm finding is that AI is bridging some of the gaps between the silos of the different departments. There is more emphasis to ensure that the products that you're producing deliver that value as well. It's more important than ever, Mark.

The Selling Well Podcast | David Fauser & Mike Sparling | AI In Professional Sales

That's one thing we haven't had on our list. What about leveraging AI for better understanding our existing clients and how they feel we compete and win in the marketplace? There are the old-school CSATs that are always a little benign to me. They're a little generic and benign. Can we leverage these agents to interact with clients to truly help us define why we get selected and why clients invest in our companies so that we can continue to refine and then let the whole world know what is unique and different about us? I'm thinking aloud as we do this.

If you think of what an AI is very strong at, it's reasoning over a large data set and finding patterns. Likely, within every selling cycle that you've executed in all the communications, all the engagements, all the notes, all the work that was done, there are signals that you have not yet seen that explain your value proposition, why you're differentiated, and why you won. Turning that over with an open mind and letting the system surface those patterns probably calls out things that you hadn't thought of before.

Moving Beyond Pilots: Implementing Intentional AI Strategies

Thanks, Mike. What a great thought. David, you're in executive meetings where you're getting called out on AI and what the strategy is. If we’re thinking about the future, any suggestions for the people tuning in as to what to do outside of being able to respond and saying, “We're doing a pilot,” which we're seeing a lot of. Have you guys seen a bit of that? We're seeing a lot out there in the marketplace, which is, “I've got a pilot started.” Any other suggestions for where to start, how to deploy, or how to initiate projects without it being career-limiting?

I'm happy to share because I don't think it's rocket science. I’m using the word intentional quite a bit as a vocabulary word. I’m being very intentional in regard to the exact way, from when we don't even know there's a client yet, or when we first realize that we want to contact somebody, all the way to them renewing, and every single step that actions that our sellers do in that process or those that touch them. That's pretty painstaking to gather that detail. What’s very important is this is not a judging exercise. I don't care how we're doing it. It is what it is.

Map out the truth.

Mark, I love your saying everything starts with the truth because it does. It’s making the employees feel comfortable that there's no sense in leading me down a path, because if you lead me down a path, we're going to be solving the wrong problem. It is what it is. It’s a full map-out of it end-to-end. From there, I'm looking at high-value, high-time and low-value, low-time type of activities.

For example, for our salespeople, we'd be putting a proposal together. Is that valuable to the client? No, that's not valuable to the client. From there, I'll be able to start to say, “One thing I want to do is make a proposal. I will make an agent for that, and that's going to be their only job. They're going to do it well.” I'm taking a look at low-value tasks. Start with low-risk things that you can do throughout that and then start to build from there more.

Also, the other thing is using and utilizing our CRM with all the data that we have in there for things that Mike was talking about. I want to identify those key points that Mike was talking about within the selling process that I think I know, but I may not know. I want to then make sure that we build out on those key points to understand that so we're positioned well moving forward.

David, that aligns exactly with what Mike said at the beginning, where he was saying to map out the whole entire customer journey, including post-sale, renewal, and growth. If we start and map that out exactly, then you could delineate in terms of the core activities and functions in each. You might be able to crawl, walk, and run with AI to say, “We're going to pick out certain things and start to get in the game at least a little bit.”

That seems like a good strategy to me because I could start to get comfortable with, A) Consulting companies that might help us go through that kind of journey. B) I get a little bit more comfortable with some of the platforms and technologies before I make the huge leap all in and lose my job, picking the wrong ERP system. I can crawl, walk, and run to figure out which organizations are staying current and which platforms seem like they'd be the right idea for us. It's great thinking. Your thoughts on that, Mike? Anything to build on there?

It’s such a great scaffold to build on, for sure. At the start of each year, they always talk about what the word of the year is. The word we're going to retire in 2026 is pilot. The age of piloting has passed. As executives, business owners, and leaders, what I think we have to be doing now is purpose. Let's not move with haste, but let's move with purpose towards a set of goals.

To the points David was making, David and his team are building agents. If you jumped in a time machine, went back 3 years, and told yourself in 2022 or ‘23, “One day, you're going to be building agents and their software. They go and do these things. They're deterministic or probabilistic. They can generate documents,” you would think, “This future me is crazy. What happened to the world? What was in the water?” That's where we have to be.

Mark, you and I have talked a number of times about two things I coach people on whenever I get a chance. One is to have a conversation with an AI. Don't type a prompt. You’re like, “Here's a prompt,” you get an answer, and you’re like, “I'm done,” or take that answer, go off, and massage it mechanically on my own. That doesn't further your ability to do more with AI. Creating those cycles where 5, 6, 7 times I've refined through the conversational interface the work I'm doing.

Microsoft did a major update to Copilot, which is a platform I use a lot. Copilot agents are no longer beside Microsoft Office. They became part of the Office experience. In Word, I can say, “Do this action to this document,” and it acts on the document. Before, if I said, "Change all the fonts here. Rewrite this chapter because we're not using this set of terminology. We're using this now,” and go. The sidecar would do a lot of things and show me a lot of things in the conversation window that I then had to take, copy, paste, act upon the document, and make happen.

Suddenly, this one upgrade quietly comes out, and the agents work directly with my spreadsheet, my Word document, or my slide deck. A senior Microsoft researcher said, “One of the things is we always dreamt we would do that when we first launched Copilot, but the models weren't strong enough. Compute wasn't there. The local devices didn't have the access means to make that happen.” A couple of years later, it started to happen. If you weren't leaning in or if you were practicing only by, “I type a prompt, I get an answer, and I go and do the work.” You would have missed one of the most fundamental work transformation things of the last couple of months.

Suddenly, you're that much more productive. You're able to talk to your spreadsheet, ask it questions, and go on. If you're not a Copilot guy because you're an Anthropic user or a ChatGPT user, their plugins natively activate within those products. That's the thing that brings such productivity. If you are not practicing with the AI every day, or maybe you're talking to it or typing to it, but you're saying, “1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th outcome,” once uncomfortable with the outcome, then you say, “Now, I want you to analyze this and tell me what's wrong, or what's the counter thought, or what I missed. Teach me something I don't know yet about my body of work and my expertise.” You learn a little more.

If we don't kind of get rid of the word pilot and go, “I am now engaged. We are orchestrating this outcome together.” We're going to still be watching the firms that are AI-forward and pushing ahead. They're going to keep moving ahead of us. We'll have to say to our boards, “I spent all the money on the tools. I did some training and people prompt. Here's my telemetry. It says people prompt. Why is the competitor so much further ahead?” I would almost say it's because they're orchestrating and cycling instead of tasking. Those are really big distinctions. Piloting hides behind tasking. Executing drives forward with transforming, modifying, or rebuilding.

That's the key point to take away from this episode. Get away from pilot. I won't quote the article properly, but the last couple of quarterly business review magazines have talked about this. They’re like, “Get out of pilot. Forget pilot. Get in and start so you can learn in real-time.” I cannot believe the time in terms of how quickly it's gone. I'm going to throw out a cheeky question. I'm not sure this has a perfect answer.

The Edge Of Excellence: Competing In A Level-Playing Field

I continue to be this believer in B2B sales, and frankly, in life, the incredible impact of being a little bit better than a competitor. We've seen it in hockey in game seven. It's one shot, one inch against the skate. One puck and one team moves forward. They didn't have to blow them out in four games. It goes to game seven, and it's one shot. That's how Canada lost gold. One shot, one inch away from the goalie’s skate.

The Selling Well Podcast | David Fauser & Mike Sparling | AI In Professional Sales

If we imagine this world in the future where it eventually becomes this level-playing field, every organization's got access to the same AI tools and platforms. It becomes a bit democratized where it's not cost-prohibitive in any way. Salespeople who want to can get in there and leverage it. They're all leveraging it the same way. How do salespeople compete and win against each other? What are the things they need to focus on to be 5% or 7% better than a competitor where they still win? Thoughts, David?

Value. Understanding how you're bringing value to that individual and making their job easier, and what value you bring to their organization. I don't know how else to say it, but to me, value and relationships are going right back to the way sales used to be back before it had gotten into sales. It seems to be going full circle. That's how you're going to be competing and winning. You're right. The smallest company will have the same advantage as the bigger companies in a lot of ways. Mark, the future of the people that take some of the concepts from your book, some of your teaching, and some of the other professional habits, the age of the professional salesperson is here.

The age of the professional salesperson is here.

Eventually.

We've talked a lot about how important it is in the skill gap. There's going to be a time where we're going to say, “There used to be a lot of sales jobs out there. Mediocre salespeople could have a career.” I don't think that is going to be the case in the future. If you're out there and you're tuning in, and you're a salesperson, start gearing up your talent because it's going to be pretty valuable moving forward.

Well said. Mike?

That’s an excellent set of ideas there, David. We're circling around something that I've often referred to as the how trap. We are not going to differentiate based on our tools or our execution for much longer. It might be William Gibson's “The future is already here.” It's not evenly distributed. If everybody can do the same thing at the same level of outcome, what's going to separate us is how we organize our people, what we choose to do, and why we choose to do that, so strategy, planning, organization, and leadership.

Let’s go back to the point you were making before, David, about how you've got all these agents, and you've got your workforce, and they're working together on those outcomes. From the time you're first learning how to stand up as a toddler, you’re rewarded through life by how. “How do I shoot the puck? If I shoot the puck better than someone else, I can get a contract to play hockey. If I can lead an organization, how I do that is what I explain to a board and get hired to go forward and do.”

In November 2022, when ChatGPT launched, we began to very quickly enter into a world where how is not the differentiator anymore. It is looking at the how trap as an organization, an individual, or a professional salesperson and saying, “I can't be trapped by how. I have to differentiate by who, why, and what.” Those soft skills, strategy skills, governance articulation, and value creation all have to be the tools that we bring to the job site because the tools of execution will already be the job site. We're going to have to do an awful lot of retraining to make that happen, but we'll be better for it when it comes to be.

Cultivating Curiosity: Resources For Staying Current On AI

What a great discussion. Thank you. Last question, and then we're going to wrap this out of respect for your time. I could keep doing this for hours. Resources. How do you stay current? Mike, any suggestions for the group and team, and then David? For the people tuning in, they want to know something they can do to get deep, to figure out more, and to learn more. You gave us a great tip about having a live conversation with AI and trying to learn a difference in terms of a point of view rather than getting tactical research. Other thoughts or resources that might be helpful to people tuning in?

We live in a golden age of information and access. I could list five podcasts. Each of you could list five more that I've never heard of. We could spend our whole time plugged in and learning from that. Intellectual curiosity is the most powerful tool you will have. Mark, you and I have talked before. When you're sitting in the car in traffic, and your first instinct is to turn on Led Zeppelin and let your brain go away so you can get home somehow, turn on your favorite ChatGPT agent.

Turn the voice mode on and say, “Something's bugging me. I heard someone say this term.” You're in a safe zone to say, “I keep hearing people say the word inference, and I don't understand it or why do I need so many data centers?” Keep that narrative for 15 or 20 minutes and say, “Be more technical. Explain it.” One of the great strengths of the models is they can take something exceptionally technical and explain it to you like you're a grade nine student.

In matrix algebra, maybe most of us are grade nine students, and we need it explained in a way we understand it. There's a feature in ChatGPT called Pulse. When it learns the things, you're interested in, it'll surface or curate a collection of articles and ideas every day for you. You can pick one and go, “I got a 25-minute drive. I'm stuck in traffic. Tell me about this idea. What is neuro symbolic architecture, and why will that change the future of agents?”

Mark always likes this line. When you're all the way done to the point where you feel like you're ready for the cutoff, then throw at the curveball and say, “Now, tell me why everything you told me is wrong.” Your intellectual curiosity will then pick out, “I like it. This other opposing view, I get. I'll synthesize my own worldview from that.” Let the AIs teach us what we're going to learn by mining all of that data, all of those podcasts, and all of those releases. Lather, rinse, and repeat. Be intellectually curious. Always look behind those doors that say, “Do not enter.”

Be intellectually curious and always look behind those doors that say do not enter.

I've used AI the way you've suggested. I have a couple of slightly compressed vertebrae in my neck. The learning point is don't fight somebody in beer league hockey who has no teeth. They got that way because they're good at fighting. In an incident from many years ago, something popped up. I had some X-rays done. I'm getting a little help on it. I used ChatGPT and said, “I have no idea what this means.”

They'll send me all the legal terms and give me the X-ray. I say, “Explain it to me like I'm in grade nine.” It said, “Don't worry. You're fine. What you have is very normal.” That's how it started. Suddenly, my blood pressure went down, and I could breathe normally. David, any other thoughts or comments on resources to stay current?

For resources, we could find thousands of them. I didn't know you could have a conversation in your car. I'm going to do that on my way home.

Thanks, Mike.

My final thought on this internally, especially coming from an engineering-first organization, is this whole idea with the waterfall and how we used to approach things. You talked about the pilots and agility. The resource, to me, is to try. That sounds pretty simple. As long as you're not making major investments, try, fail, and see. Let it become your friend. The train has left the station. This thing's coming. It's not like you’re going to say, “I'm not going to do AI.” It's coming. The faster you embrace and make it your friend, the better. That's my thoughts on that.

If I can add one more piece to what you're saying, David. We've talked about this through the last 45 minutes. Remember that your intellectual curiosity sets the bar. If the AI can't do it today, the model is going to rev this month, and it may be able to do it in two weeks. Forever going back and retesting what you believe are the boundaries, you will discover the boundaries are moving that fast, and they're that fluid. I hire for curiosity. The rest of it, I figure I can teach and develop.

I love that. Why don't we end there? What a great note to end on. David and Mike, thank you so much. Mike, if people want to learn more about you or they have some questions about this episode, are you comfortable if they reach out to you directly? How would they connect with you?

Reach out to me directly. LinkedIn is my platform of choice. Look me up on LinkedIn at Mike Sparling and send me a message. I answer all of them.

David, how about you?

The same, LinkedIn. I’d be happy to hear from any sales leader out there. I’m always happy to connect, learn what you're doing, and share ideas.

Thank you so much for joining. Thanks for all the help, tips, and insights. Every time I talk to the two of you, I learn something. Team, thank you for joining. We run the show because we want to improve the performance and professionalism of B2B sales. We believe that in doing that, we improve the lives of everybody in professional sales. This show is one of the ways we do that. Thank you for joining. I hope you enjoyed this episode.

If you did, please like and subscribe to the show. Send a copy of this episode to your friends. When you do that, that's how we can attract fantastic guests like David and Mike. One other note, and a shameless pitch here. We've initiated a second show because we do get questions from amazing people tuning in either through LinkedIn or through my email address, MarkCox@InTheFunnel.com.

What we do is we review some of those questions in what's called the ITF Office Hours Podcast. That's going to be starting. We've got 5 or 6 episodes in the can, so they'll come back-to-back. Keep an eye open for those. Let us know what you'd like us to comment on because that'll help guide future episodes. In the meantime, thanks so much for joining. We wish everybody a great year for 2026 in terms of selling. We'll see you next time.

 

Important Links

About Mike Sparling

Mike Sparling is the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer at Multi-Health Systems Inc.

He has built his career at the rare intersection of deep technology and real-world business execution.

Trained as a software engineer and solution architect, he began by designing complex systems to solve meaningful problems. Over time, his perspective expanded beyond engineering into the realities of how companies actually operate—customers, competition, go-to-market execution, and value creation.

This shift led him into the world of enterprise sales—not transactional selling, but sales as a discipline. He saw firsthand how world-class sales leadership can transform a company’s trajectory—aligning product, partnerships, and execution to drive market share and growth.

Across multiple organizations, Mike continued to work closely with sales leaders, developing a practical understanding of how high-performing sales teams operate and scale.

In parallel, his career has consistently been at the forefront of artificial intelligence—spanning industrial systems, knowledge management, behavioral analytics, and most recently, neuroscience and biotechnology at the intersection of human and machine cognition.

Today, Mike’s work sits at the convergence of AI, value-chain transformation, and customer-facing execution—bringing together technical depth and a grounded understanding of how organizations create real value. He is the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer at Multi-Health Systems Inc.

Why Your Win Rates In Sales Are The Real Productivity Metric With Andy Paul

The Selling Well Podcast | Andy Paul | Win Rates

In the competitive landscape of B2B, mastering win rates in sales is crucial for long-term growth and sustainable business success. Join host Mark Cox as he sits down with Andy Paul, the renowned sales expert and author of Sell Without Selling Out, to challenge the status quo of modern selling techniques. Instead of relying on top-of-the-funnel activity, discover why shifting your focus to "change conversations" and optimizing your current pipeline is the key to true sales productivity. This episode provides actionable strategies for leaders who want to stop discounting products and start closing deals effectively by truly understanding the ROI for their buyers.

—-

Watch the Episode here

Listen to the Podcast here

Why Your Win Rates In Sales Are The Real Productivity Metric With Andy Paul

The Legend Of B2B Sales Podcasting

What a show we've got for you because we've got Andy Paul. All of you know the name Andy Paul. Andy is by far the goat of B2B sales podcasting, and it's not even close. He's the greatest of all time in terms of business-to-business sales shows. He actually had three shows. He had a show called Accelerate that then became the Sales Enablement Podcast and finally had the Win Rate Podcast. The combination of those three probably did somewhere between 1200 and 1400 shows. Everybody who was anybody in B2B sales or leadership or coaching was on that show.

Andy's also the author of three fantastic books, Zero Time Selling, Amp Up Your Sales, and then the book with the greatest title of all time for selling, Sell Without Selling Out. I met with Andy eighteen months ago in New York City. Coincidentally, right after that, he took a sabbatical. I hope it had nothing to do with meeting me, but he took a sabbatical from our industry. Although you'll hear in this episode what he was up to, I always knew he'd be coming back, and I'm so thrilled that we've had a chance to get him back into the industry and starting with this show.

He's working on a new book that he talks about during the show. We really talked about a couple of things in this episode that I think will be very interesting. Andy takes an approach that we actually do not need to go up the funnel. Andy's approach is that when we look at win rates for most businesses, they're somewhere between 20% and 30%. They're just way too low. Andy's focus is how do we actually just get better at winning what's already in our funnel? That way we're not dramatically increasing the cost of sales. It can have a real impact on a business.

Really interesting discussion, as you would expect with someone like Andy. The second thing Andy zones in on is the cost of sales, but the true cost of sales or sales productivity makes a very interesting recommendation that we should actually allot our selling time to particular deals to really understand who's actually investing what time and what deals, and are we getting a return on it? It’s a really interesting conversation.

I happen to like that idea because I think in some cases our most important deals, we may not be investing enough selling time. We're so focused on solutioning. I do not know how much time we're spending on selling. There are so many different interesting conversations we have, folks, because Andy's absolutely on fire in this episode. You're really going to enjoy this one. I continue to learn every time I have a conversation with Andy. I hope you learned from this episode too. If you do, please like and subscribe to the show because that's actually how we get fantastic guests like Andy Paul. Here he is.

Andy, welcome to the show.

Reflections On A Sabbatical And Intellectual Curiosity

Mark, thank you for having me. It's been a while.

It's been a while on two fronts, actually. One, we took a pause on the show. You and I connected face to face in New York a little over a year ago, maybe a year and a half ago. We paused our show for a little bit. You've taken a little bit of a sabbatical. What have you been up to?

I paused. Trying to decide what I want to do with the rest of my life. The real answer. I've been working on a novel, which I've always wanted to write. Learning a lot there, which is what I always think of the famous Mark Twain quote, "I wanted to write you a short letter, but I didn't have time. I sat down, wrote you a long one instead," which is the story of my novels. Overwritten and way too long. Yes, working on a new sales book as well.

When we talked a year ago, and you said you were hearing a change ago, you're talking about the novel. In the back of my mind, I thought he's not done. I was just thinking, we'll stay close or we'll stay connected. There's lots more value to come in. For folks tuning in, you go back into we'll have the links to the past discussions with Andy. We're not going to get too many more interviews with someone with Andy's depth.

I'm going to talk about Andy's books in a second, but Andy, for those who do not know, is the world's top sales podcaster. You can have debates and argue with anybody. Andy ran two shows that were the best sales podcasts out there. One was called Accelerate, which merged into the Sales Enablement Podcast, and Andy combined 1200 episodes or more?

When you include that, then I started a new podcast after I left the Sales Enablement Podcast, yes, the Win Rate Podcast. Yes, more than 1200 episodes altogether.

When you start to think of the number, one of the things that I was always so amazed by, because I really enjoyed the podcast, I was likely to be a guest on the podcast a couple of times. We'll do those in the links too. One of the things I was amazed by was just the continual interest and excitement with every new guest. The other thing, even me in my earliest days, no book, no methodology, nothing, just getting started, you just had this sincere appreciation for the perspective of a guest. It almost felt like in the early days when we had nothing behind us, you treated me like one of the top global guests you had. I loved coming on the podcast for that, which I really appreciate, and thank you for that, by the way.

I enjoyed the conversation so much. Part of that, I think, is that if you want to be successful in podcasts or creating content, you cannot take it from the perspective that you know everything. For me, every time I met with someone on the show was a chance to learn something new and a new perspective, and everybody delivered on that. Give people a chance because you never know where the next great idea is going to come from. It's not necessarily somebody with 30 years of experience or more. It could be somebody that's got a fresh new perspective on the approach to sales. For me, it was just like, “I want to talk to as many people, widespread people, and see what I can learn.”

Meeting someone is a chance to learn something new and a new perspective. You can't take it from the perspective that you know everything.

What a great and absolutely spectacular approach. I'll be honest with you, that was something I stole and mirrored, and I learned it from you. The other thing I found, Andy, in the earliest days of doing my podcast, I'd study the person's book or their multiple books, a few of their books, and learn that from you. Not all podcasters did that. In the earliest days, I was pretty judgmental about some of the books. I'd be cramming a book and reading a book, and I'd be going, "I know more than this. I know a lot more than this. How does this person have a company ten times my size?"

You get the person in a discussion, and you go, "They really have some great context and experience and something to offer." The more I did them, the more I realized I got a chance to learn from everybody I'm speaking to, which completely changed my mindset, completely elevated my joy of doing the podcasts. Again, not air made delivers. I've had some rough conversations. By the way, did you have a couple of confrontational conversations or something that you could never air?

I have one or two. Where someone just was determined to talk only about themselves. I wasn't there to be a promotional vehicle for them. Certainly, if they had a book or something they wanted to talk about, we'd do it. For a couple of instances, somebody just wanted to make it all about that. Just never aired it. We could finish the conversation, but I made the choice not to put it up. It's funny, I developed this reputation of being a challenging interview. People didn't respond well to it. That's, by and large, most people did. I loved it.

One time somebody, LinkedIn F, had been a guest and said, "I survived my interview with Andy Paul." I never got a gotcha question or an attempt to be unfair. What I just expected from guests was that if they had a point of view, they could explain it. That there was a justification and a rationale behind it that made sense. If there was a hole in it, I was not afraid to say, "This part doesn't seem to make sense,” or “I really don't buy into that."

Most people got it right now, and we're perfectly willing to engage in the conversation. They have a small handful of 1200 guests. I think there are only 2 or 3 episodes I didn't air. Once I had some egg, it was a fairly well-known name at the time that, when I published the episode, they called me and said, "You need to change this part." I said, "What do you mean?" My answer to this question ran counter to what I'd just written about in my book.

Not my job to edit your responses. You made that response, that's and it really got almost to the point where they're threatening litigation. I said, "Fine, won't show. We won't air it." It had already gone out, but I took it off the inventory. A few people are sensitive. Again, by and large, most people have the same desire as everybody else does. As an author, I always tell people, people say, "What's this book about?" I said, “Let's have a thousand people read it first and then I'll find out what it's about."

The Evolution Of The Sales Mindset

How interesting you say that. That's a great number, by the way, one or two for 1200 plus interviews, not too bad at all. After our first interview, I didn't find you a challenging interview once I understood who you were and your perspective. The first time we had an interview together, I was really just starting the business thirteen years ago. We had people who booked me on the show. Somebody who worked for me booked me into ten podcasts. It was the early days of podcasting. This probably was 8 or 9 years ago.

I did 4 or 5, and they were the easiest discussions I'd ever had. What are you trying to do in sales? I'm just walking into these things. I'm not prepping for them. I'm not checking anybody out. I got so complacent that they booked me in with you when I was literally on a client site consulting with somebody. I had to go into a different room, jump on this thing, no prep, jump on. You said something about, I think it was something I should go back to, but it was, "Tell me, what do you look for when you're recruiting people?" I gave an answer like, “I read Who by Geoff Smart.”

I was so arrogant and confident in the answer. You said, "It's pretty interesting. Stanford just released a report,” which was almost completely counter to everything I just said. Also talked about how meaningless an interview process was, because it's like flipping a coin. I remember hitting the mute going, "Holy s***, I'm in a different type of interview here." Suddenly all my adrenaline comes up. Now I'm in fight or flight, trying to figure out, “I better wake up for this interview.” There were 2 or 3 after that, but it was just great.

I enjoyed it from the first time we spoke and identified a kindred spirit, which not everybody was, and that's fine. I said we all come from different perspectives about what it's required to succeed in this business. There is no one path, as I wrote about in one of my books. I just want people to be thoughtful about it, though. Unfortunately, over the last twenty years in particular, everybody thought we could take this game that's so highly personalized as professionals, highly personalized, and just turn it into a cookie-cutter business, and we've suffered from it.

Nolan, I do not think anyone would really make an argument that that has not been the case. We've seen win rates fall. We've seen quota performance fall. Yet there are people who think that the problem is salespeople or sales managers as opposed to what we're trying to do and what we're trying to teach people to do and how to enable them to do it and so on. It requires new perspectives, requires a different way of thinking about it. Recently, I've been doing work on a new sales book. I found a better way to express what I think the real issue is and how we address it. It takes time.

I'm going to circle back, by the way, to some of the earlier books, but let's go on that. What are you writing about, and what is the different way to express it? What is the real problem?

The real problem is that we're fundamentally doing the wrong things. I'm working in terms of what the new paradigms are. Paradigms exist really to change and challenge persistent problems that exist and big problems. It's really what's required. We've done this incremental change, just tweak here, tweak there, tweak there. It's like, now that things are more fundamental, we're just not addressing them, and they filter through the entire sort of sales ecosystem. One example, and it's funny, shocked audiences when I talked about this, but I said, “One of the real problems in sales is we've lost the ability to win.”

It's about that.

It's become a lost art. In most sales organizations, you can see this pervasively on LinkedIn and so on is, somebody, a seller, has got a 30% win rate. They're our top people. I cover the perspective and the experience in the background, which is that the minimum acceptable win rate for an individual seller is that you win more than you lose. Full stop, 50.1%. That should be the culture of the organization. That is what we stand for as an organization. If you have an opportunity, a qualified opportunity, you're going to win more of those than you're going to lose.

The impacts filter down. I was talking to senior-level executives about this, and they were taking them back a little bit because they correlate that with winning at all costs. It's like, “No, it's not winning at all costs.” Actually, it's just sort of the opposite. To win successfully, high level win more than they lose. It's the opposite of winning at all costs. You're so focused on activity. I said, “What are the circumstances on which you fire a salesperson?”

They miss quota.

They lose. They do not win. We pay salespeople to win, full stop. You do not win. You lose your job. That's not the culture that's in these organizations. Everything should be focused on winning more than you lose. That said, the trickle down impacts that are, if you have a sales team where, by and large, people are winning more than others, you're going to sell more with fewer people. The holy grail is basically, how do we sell more with fewer people? Increase your win rates. How do we increase our renewal rates? The data will show you that renewals won by deals with sellers with high win rates renew at higher rates than low win rate sellers.

The holy grail to selling more with fewer people is to increase win rates.

It’s because they sold with a proper business case in the first place. There was a real return on investment. It's easier to renew because we're actually solving a real problem.

Exactly. When you talk about management, why do you want to increase win rates? Your renewal rates are going to be higher. It's like no one's ever thought about that. There are other reasons to trickle down. The fact is that the other one, too, is individual productivity. The seller will go up. What I mean by that is, and you and I have touched on this in the past, I believe, but we should, as a management, be focused on what I'd like to reduce it to a number. What is the revenue that a seller generates per hour of selling time? Consulting firms, they track this.

Professional services, law firms, etc.

I had the benefit back years and years ago of working for a company that was in defense work in the United States. When you sell to the Department of Defense, everybody has to track their hours in the company. Not just the people working on the project, because those who weren't on the project, the hours are collected and used to calculate the overhead rate they got applied to the bids that you made to the Department of Defense. That was all audited and so on. As a sales guy, even though I wasn't working on defense business, I was still keeping a time card every day, eight hours.

I was charging an overhead account. Finally, one day when I took over this group and was leading us, I looked, and I said, "Why don't we assign job numbers to every qualified opportunity in the pipeline?" People charge their time, both the sellers and support, and so through others. Everybody charges their time to the job. It's not rocket science. Say consulting companies, everybody does it. Suddenly I knew to the hour how much time it took to generate X amount of revenue. I knew by individual how much time they took to generate a certain unit of revenue.

The Math Of Sales Productivity: Revenue Per Hour

I could tell, “Generate a million dollars with twenty hours of selling time. This guy's doing it with 40. Maybe this guy, what this one knows that this one does not. Why does this one require more support from the organization?” Much insight into what's actually happening when you do that. Now, the other insight you get, which is, again, one of the changes we need to make in sales, is you begin to understand that a sales cycle is not a duration. It's a quantity.

Tell me about that. Quantity of the aggregate hours?

Yes. The fact that it takes place over a month or two months or three months does not really matter. What you find is, “We're limited by hours.” Now, if I know that my sellers individually say, “Can generate X number of dollars per hour of selling time, I know at the beginning of the year, I can calculate how much they're going to sell accurately, barring a change in how effective they are in front of the customers.” I talked to companies about this. I say, "That's great. I know how many dollars they generate per hour of selling time. I'm talking more hours." I said, "That's not changing their productivity. Their productivity is still the same."

Have you ever rolled this out with somebody?

Just to come out of my own companies I've worked for.

Just your own company, the ones internally.

This is not because companies are not doing that. I've spoken with all the major big consulting companies. They fundamentally do this. Why it has not transitioned, why I'm able to translate this into just conventional B2B selling, is beyond me because the tools exist. The tools exist more easily than before. We were doing physical time sheets in Excel when I first started doing this. Now it's a no-brainer. This is data. Why wouldn't you want this? Why wouldn't I want to know that this salesperson requires 50% more support from the rest of the organization? Maybe that's good if they're generating 75% more revenue per hour of selling time.

You say, "They're making really good use of the resources of the organization, whereas maybe this other one is not." I said, why wouldn't you want that data? That really speaks to performance about how effective a seller is with a customer. This idea is, "We've got a 90-day sales cycle." No, you do not. You probably have a 30-hour sales cycle. When you look at a composition, your pipeline, does it really matter how it spreads out? Not necessarily, but you say, "Great. If we're trying to serve, get these decisions made within a certain timeframe.

The answer is, you see what most companies do. We're going to discount, or we're going to throw more people at the problem. We're going to make it more expensive." One client that celebrated, a software company, celebrated getting their first $300,000 deal, and they did a really good job of documenting. All the processes they went through and all the meetings they had and so on. When they did a debrief, and I was a consultant, I talked to the CEO. I said, "Congratulations. We had a great time." I said, "You're not going to do another one of these deals this year."

It’s because it took too much time.

When you track that, though, then you say, "Good. We need to change.”

Why change your ideal client profile? You might have to go after smaller deals.

How are we interacting with the buyer? This gets back to another fundamental change I think that we need to make, we absolutely have to make, we do not really change things, is we train our sellers from this perspective that your job is to go sell a product. That's a problem because that's wrong.

The seller’s job is not to sell a product, but to make a change.

What are they doing?

That's what they're doing. It's not what they should be doing because we have this whole idea of like we're monitoring intent data. We get these signals from our buyers. They're in the market to buy. No, they're not. They're in the market to make a change. Dramatically different, because we say, “Look, they're in the market to buy. I'm going to throw you into my sales process.” Try to make my first call. I'm going to try to make a discovery call. It's like, “Hold on a second. What they really want to do is they want to make a change from what they're doing.” They want to achieve a different outcome in some portion of the business than what they're getting.

What's that change they want to make? The conversation you have, what I call a change conversation versus a sales conversation, leads you down a different path. What I'm trying to do is I'm trying to instead of discover what the problem is, which we can get back to because think discovery is such a huge problem with us today, is what I want to do is I want to help the customer define the outcomes they want to achieve, the changed outcomes, and the change path they're going to use to get there. We go in now today in sales and say, “I've got this ICP, and everybody shares this one problem.” No, they do not.

Of course not.

Shifting From Sales Conversations To Change Conversations

What people are trying to do is they're trying to make a change. Where we get the cart before the horse is we think, “If we can identify the problem, we can identify a prospect and the path to selling. You really do not know what the problem is until you understand where they want to go because when you understand and help them define where they want to go, the problem is, what's the obstacle keeping me from getting there? If we can be the seller that helps to buy our approach from that standpoint, let's define where you want to be. Let's define how we can get there. We're going to provide some perhaps new thoughts about how to do that. The decision they're making is, are we going to change or not? Not, are we going to buy this product or not?

Am I going to invest in achieving that desired outcome? Actually, do I believe you can help me get to that desired outcome?

My experience has been pretty successful. It's a whole lot of stuff in my career. In almost all cases, being an underdog working for small startup companies, but selling a hundred-million-dollar-type systems in some cases, a million dollars, the largest, a well over a hundred million. It's all the same. If I could help the buyer define what it is that change they want to make. The way I do that is I build trust with them, and through the trust, I build my influence with them.

That's what buyers do is when you build trust, what they're saying is I'm going to open the doors to your influence. If I can do that, it doesn't matter how big a company I'm selling to the customer. I have the inside track because I'm not saying you have this problem. I’m saying let's define it together. Let's work together on where it is you want to be. This is an opportunity to invest, not just put a Band-Aid on a pain point.

When you build trust, buyers are going to open the doors to your influence.

This also ties back into our conversation at the beginning. Salespeople today, what do they do? They discount, or they try to give things away because I have no idea what the desired outcome really is. I'm pitching a product, and somebody said they had a modicum of interest. I'm to fire a proposal over fast enough, as fast as I can. Why? It’s because one of the main metrics I get tracked on is the size of my funnel. We start to track all these things. We're tracking the wrong ones. This is really such an interesting idea. This productivity, you talked about professional services.

Way back when, a few years back, when we had Dan Pink on the podcast, and we were talking about To Sell Is Human and his latest book, at the end I go, “Why are you so interested in sales?” He didn't, of course. He didn't grow up in sales. He said the whole idea of writing the book the first time was that he was seeing a huge gap between this stereotype of sales and what he knew. He had friends who were in sales. At the end, he said he went through this list of what his friends really are, problem solvers. They have huge levels of business acumen. They're smart.

They're forward-thinking. They're innovative. He said, “Today, B2B sales is management consulting.” Management consultants track their time. Management consultants have nothing to sell. They actually come in, and they work with you to understand what's going on with your business. Usually, they'll come in and say, based on public disclosures, you're lagging in your industry against a couple of metrics. Let's talk about it. They'll get pointed down a direction to say, "Let's get a room and see, figure out if there's a way of helping you achieve these meaningful business outcomes."

Sell Without Selling Out

Sell Without Selling Out

That's really this idea that I mentioned before about selling a sales conversation. Let's have a change conversation because, to that point, I wrote about what you just talked about, and Sell Without Selling Out was that I spent a chunk of my career working with these startups. Where often we didn't have the product yet. My job was to go out to one company. I got hired to start a division of the company that was selling.

They were the offense company. I was starting the commercial side of things, and the CEO said, “Go sell to whoever you want as long as they pay for the development of the product.” I'm like, “Okay.” That's what I did. I didn't have a product to sell. When you have to put yourself in that situation where you do not have a product to sell, you really open, first of all, it's way more fun than actually selling an actual product.

B is, you have to be more creative and more innovative and more thoughtful about how do I surface something that resonates with them that represents a change from what they're currently doing that they would perceive to be a great investment opportunity, great way to allocate their capital. That is the perspective that every seller should have on every single deal. I wrote that in Sell Without Selling Out. it approaches every deal as if you do not have a product to sell. I'm there to help you think about the outcomes that you want to change and how to achieve them.

For the folks who help us with editing, that's the blurb, by the way, for the podcast. Approach everything you do in selling as if you have no product to sell. I love that idea, Andy. Immediately, what it takes away from us is that most of the time, based on the way our brains work, I'm just waiting to interrupt you. I'm talking to a buyer. The way the brain works, they speak at 125 words a minute. My brain processes at 400 words a minute. I cannot stay focused. I just want to interrupt. All I want to do is pitch a product. Particularly the newer I am in sales, that's all I know how to do. I do not have business acumen. Maybe I have this much industry acumen. I learned my product because that's what they taught me before they unleashed me.

Again, not to hike my books, it was part of my just basic philosophy through all my books. I thought about self-outselling out is, there's four core strengths or skills you need to have as a human. Connection, curiosity, understanding, generosity.

That's great.

Your ability to connect with another human being to build trust. The trust leads to influence. Curiosity, not just the superficial curiosity that we see in discovery questions, really to connect with them, really understand where it is they want to go and where they see across the spectrum of stakeholders, where they see the opportunities in their business, which is not about fixing a problem. It's about what's the opportunity, which is we have to go away from being so problem-centric to being opportunity-centric. You have to fully understand it.

I talk about the book. It's certainly true in my experience. Again, being the underdog and the vast majority of deals that I've won, convenience, big tech companies of the day are, and ask the customer, “Why did you choose us?” I said, “It’s because you're the only one that made us feel understood.” You have to bridge that gap between knowing something and really truly understanding it. You have to be generous in how you help the buyer make these decisions to make change. People do not always connect generosity with sales. It fundamentally means that you're giving without the expectation of getting something in return.

The Selling Well Podcast | Andy Paul | Win Rates

Win Rates: People don't always connect generosity with sales, but it fundamentally means that you're giving without the expectation of getting something in return.

Tough, right?

It's not like you're not motivated to get them to do business with you, but it's just not a quid pro quo that's so pervasive in sales. If you can do that, even without business acumen, you can go and have a great conversation with someone. Business acumen will make it much better over time. As a new seller, I'm going to think back to my own experience because I graduated college with a history major. I know nothing about business to speak of. When I got a job, everything seemed to be in sales, right?

Other than having no discernible skills, curiosity a mile wide. I am very competitive. My first year selling computer systems, on-premise big computer systems, 50 years ago, was just listening to these CEOs and these founders of these companies that I'm assigned to talk to me about their business. What I found was that if I just showed up and was authentically curious. I was asking questions that just were not designed to elicit a response of, "Are they a fit for us or not?"

They spent as much time with me as I could, as I needed. No, never had anyone throw me out. Here's a kid. I was 21. Seriously, I looked 16. Yet they gave me their time because I showed up connected, and I was sincerely interested in understanding what was happening. I was willing to ask the questions, and it pays dividends. This gets back to the topic I talked about before is we really need to think, and again, I wrote about self-hustling. Expanding on what I'm working on now is moving beyond this idea of persuasion, really to think about influence.

Persuasion Vs. Influence: Measuring Real Impact

What's the difference?

One is coercive. The other is helping people change their point of view in a more collaborative fashion. There's a book by The Catalyst written by this professor from UPenn, Jonah Berger, who said that found in some research that 100% of human beings instinctively resist being persuaded. If you build trust and the customer says, “Let's talk about that or tell me what you got.” That's different. You're influencing. You can measure influence. Challenge managers tuning in to the show. I challenge managers I work with. Tell me what your win rate is on deals that you didn't influence the buyer's definition of what it is they're trying to achieve.

It's that your win rate is going to be zero. It's very close. It's going to be very low.

As I said, how do you measure your influence? I said, it's very simple. You do not even think of talking about this before. Just create a little simple table. Two columns, three rows. Could be a couple more. The first row is what the buyer's definition of the changed outcomes they want to achieve was before you talk to them? In the second column, you put what their definition of the changed outcomes they want to achieve is now. If there's no gap between the two, you have no influence. It's that simple.

The second row, second line is, what was the buyer's definition of how they wanted to achieve the change before you talked to them? What is that definition now? If there's no gap between the two, you're just competing on features and price. Why do you want to do that? You can actually measure influence. It's tangible. You say, “Let me go look at the deals we're working on right now. It doesn't have to be after the fact.” Their definition of what they want to achieve, their vision of what they're going to achieve. If we have no influence, odds of winning are pretty low.

This does lead though, Andy, like this leads a lot of the time to any point how you look at it, somebody's definition of a business case or an ROI, or these are things you work with the client on during discovery. I know you see discovery as a bad word. I do not because for me, the whole lifecycle is discovery. Actually, it's not a stage. It's what I'm doing the whole time.

The Selling Well Podcast | Andy Paul | Win Rates

I agree. You're always learning. Here's where I'll draw the distinction. There's a certain amount of, I'll say, journalistic discovery we all want to do. There's a certain set of facts that we need to understand about the buyer. That's a discovery. Beyond that, we're trying to help the buyer. We're trying to work with the buyer to help them define what it is they want to achieve. What is the opportunity that would come from making a change in their business? That's going to lead to, “There's a business case.” Actually, writing and spelling out in the new materials, there are actually two business cases.

The first business case is what I call a ballpark business case. We're going to get to a certain point, and I'm going to say to the customer, we'd find where you want to go. We're going to learn more. To your point, we're always discovering, so on. Based on where we are now, this is the business case we put together. If we get to the end of this process and we're still within plus or minus viewpoints either way, will you commit today that you're going to make a change? Not that you're going to say goodbye to me, but that you'll commit today that you will make a change.

If they say no, for me, oftentimes that's a disqualifier for them. I do not have time for you right now. Again, my limited inventory as a seller is my time. If I'm going to be as productive as possible. These guys may have to go back to a different status on my pipeline. They're not ready because if I push it from that point, I might get no decision. You have to do this preliminary business because I learned this from one of my early bosses. It's just genius. You weed out things pretty quickly. The thing is, you want to get there as quickly as possible. This is the other part that I think has to be changed.

It starts with this idea that, and again, I wrote about it, it's all about selling out. If I bring this basis forever, if the customers are not trying to make the best decision, they're trying to make a good enough decision. Herbert Simon, Nobel Prize winner, did extensive research on this. I have two types of people. Maximizers, satisficers, people who look at every alternative and make sure they make the absolute best decision. Satisficers, which are people who will look until they find something that satisfies requirements and suffices to meet their future needs. That's actually a lot of people.

It's actually probably more people. It's somewhat situational for business people. If people are looking to make a good enough decision, we're going to look until we find something that meets these requirements, satisfies requirements, and suffices to meet future needs. Where's the urgency? The urgency is I need to be the first to build trust. If I can be the first one to build trust, then I can be the first one to build influence. If I can be the first one to build influence, then I can be the first one to help the buyer define what it is they want to do and have an understanding of it.

They're going to reach that point of satisfaction first with me, then they will with other people. Given what Simon wrote about, we're going to research that until he finds it and satisfies us. We're going to pull the plug. We're going to go for it. I experienced that so many times in my career. Sometimes there was a gap where I basically knew I was going to win the order. Got told I was going to get the order. It might take a while to work through the system. You want to be in that position. Even if it takes another two months to work through contracts and legal and so on.

Of course, once you're through that, that's different.

As a seller, your goal should be that I want to be the first to trust, I'm going to be the first to influence, I'm going to be the first to define change if I can do that. First of all, in this preliminary business case, I'm going to win more often than not. This goes back to what we talked about in the beginning. We're here to win. Our sales processes that are set up are not set up to win. They're set up to complete a series of steps. I wasn't interested in that. I wanted to win.

The Sales Leader’s Mid-Year Pivot

Maybe. Your definition of what you're trying to do is actually my definition of discovery in our process. We've got people tuning in, Andy, like the running sales teams right now. We know most of them, you and I know most of them, are sweating. We know most of them are sweating. We're just finishing the middle of the year, and smart companies are doing a Q3 sales kickoff. Not so smart companies are taking it easy and going light on the kickoff, and they think they can make it up in Q4, and Q4 is just a panic the whole time.

What would one of those leaders running a team of 8 or 10 today say, because they're all experiencing that's a universal problem. When rates are dropping, no decisions, probably increasing, all those bad signs, we forecast a deal, and they went quiet on us. If you've got any trust and influence, people do not go quiet. They'll give you a bad decision, like something happened or the business changed. They will not ignore you.

Very rare.

What would you suggest? It's pretty hard, as much as I'd like to get you back to what you did to me eight years ago and dispute this stuff. It's pretty hard to dispute these things. We want trust. We want influence. What does the leader do right now? They're in the middle of a game. They're in the middle of a year. Maybe they're sweating. They still have some time left in 2026 to make an impact. What would you do if you took over a sales organization right now?

These are longer-term structural things we're talking about. In the short term, I want to look at the people in the deals. Understand whether these are deals we should be working on or not.

There you go.

That, to me, is first. Decide whether we're really in touch with the things that are going to drive the customer to make this decision to make a change. For me, these are these definition points. The buyer. We have this issue that we think buyers still are going to make monolithic changes. Are making monolithic decisions. We're making a product purchase decision. It's like, “No. They're making 4 or 5 decisions first.” The first one was, what's the change you want to make, and how do I get there? Three, what are the obstacles in our way? Four, does the business case make sense? Five, is this the vendor we want to work with?

Those are distinct decisions they have to make that you need to be focused on. How do I win each of those decisions? It starts with, is this something that's really somebody we should be selling to? Do they really belong in our pipeline? If they do, then where are we in terms of building a level of trust and influence to say we're going to have an impact or have the ability to impact those decisions they make? It's talking to the sellers, it's talking to the prospects, it's talking to people within the organization that maybe have been talking to the prospects as well.

You'd be surprised how they get different feedback from the customer. "John's not really doing that great a job with our CEO," or whatever. You just have to get in and investigate what's happening and then make some tough calls. It could be that you've got some good deals that you got the wrong people on and you need to make changes. That's hard, tough. What's at stake is your job and the health of the company and so on. You need to do what's best for the company. Interestingly, these days, too often you say, "We're going to give this to our sellers who've got a 30% win rate." It's like, no, that's not the person to give these deals to.

Chances are, you've got people in the organization who, if they were pointed in the right direction and given the right support, would not really understand what it is they're trying to do. The things I talk about are trying to build this trust and influence. We're trying to help the customer define what it is they're trying to do. We're just not going and saying, "We've got the answer." You may find people much better suited to the job than you and make a mid-course change. I made a career out of bringing people from electrical engineering into sales.

Really? By the way, you wouldn't think traditionally when you think of the attributes of a salesperson that people think of that stereotype. It wouldn't be an actual electrical engineer.

Just to give one example, as one client, that client ran sales for about four years on a two-day-a-week basis and doubled, more than doubled sales. We sold the company for a big chunk of money. We brought a guy in from engineering to be the lead salesperson. He was pathologically shy. I could sit in the lunchroom with him after working with him for years, and he still would not say hi to me. When he talked to the customer, he understood. He understood what it was they were dealing with. He understood their challenges.

He understood where they thought they wanted to go and how we might be able to help them with that. It didn't matter at that point. He just crushed it. Have example after example. I remember one engineer, as I was recruiting to come in to work for me at one point. He said, "I cannot do that." What he means is, "I cannot try to persuade people to buy something they do not want to buy." I said, "That's great, because that's not your job." Your job is to help them identify the opportunities and the better path forward and try to be more efficient or effective or whatever.

I said, "Isn't that what you do as an engineer every day in your designs?" He goes, "Yes, I can do that." One came in, “I took over, sir.” Not quite mid-year. It actually was. It was halfway through the second quarter, just changing people out. We could have kept the course. That wasn't a huge organization. It was five salespeople. I looked at it and said, "I could do this work myself. I can do the work of at least four of these people myself." I did. We then brought in people who could take their place. We started by the end of the year, we were staffed. In the next year, this was an organization we had. I took it over. They had done six million dollars in bookings. When I took over partway through the year, the next year we had about 175 million in bookings.

What? I hope you had a piece of that company.

None of the salespeople were salespeople. Engineers. The number one guy was actually a marketing guy that converted, and he was just dynamite. Again, he wasn't the typical salesperson, but very methodical, really understood what it was we were trying to do, working on big deals that he had never worked on before. He understood what we're trying to do is help this idea of them trying to make a change. They're not trying to buy a product. They're trying to make a change.

Engineering High-Performance Sales Teams

If we can help define what that change is, then we've established influence, and we're on the inside track to win. They crushed it. My advice is to look at the people hard. Do not be afraid to make changes. You may have to pick up the slack yourself a little bit, depending on the size of the organization as a VP. Tough. Go out and do it. If you do not know how to sell a product, that's your problem. Build the team with people who are, call it curious, open-minded problem solvers. I do not want to overdo the problem-solving too much, as curious, open-minded.

Maybe opportunity spotters are the better way, because that's what you're really trying to help the customer do. I say this with all sincerity. In my career selling the better part of a billion dollars, closing, I never once had a customer that said, "We're buying to fix a pain point." We're buying to take advantage of this opportunity that presents itself to ourselves by making a change. In the process, we may be fixing a problem that's the obstacle preventing us from getting where we want to go. It's not the problem that's driving it. It's the opportunity.

It's a better future.

People are to invest in that.

By the way, talk about jumping in deep right off the deep. It's not a minor change. It's suddenly we're just measuring hours in sales productivity. What are the things, by the way, about the sales productivity that's just stuck in my craw the whole time we've been talking? You talked about saying, we might find out we're investing way too much time in the wrong opportunities. One thing that jumps out at me is I think in some cases we're not actually spending enough real time on the most important opportunities.

We'd actually look at it and go, "This thing does have legs. It actually qualifies as an opportunity." Outside of solutioning, we're not actually spending enough time helping the client's influence and earning trust and helping them identify that better future and actually building the business cases with them and actually getting through their internal processes, depending upon who they are. In some cases, we'd find the opposite. Do not actually log time on deals. We do not spend enough time.

We've had enough of the right time. With the right people.

With the right deals.

Doing the right things. This has actually come up several times in conversations I've had with people in the last few weeks. This idea that you have to be selective about who you sell to. Everybody's talking about going to market, and now we've got an AI-driven GTM. When win rates are so low, the issue is not the pipeline. You've got more than enough prospects. I'm winning the average win rate in B2B sales is less than twenty percent. It's not that you do not know prospects. It's that you're not doing a good job of working with the people you have.

If you've really dialed in on your ICP, you're just executing horribly, and there's no excuse for that. You may have to be more discerning within that pipeline, even saying, "Look, we're trying to work too many opportunities. We should be working fewer and doing a better job of it." The vision I like to give people is that you're the bouncer at the head of the velvet rope and the club is your pipeline, and not every new person gets in because as a seller, you've got an inventory of hours. That's all you've got. How are you going to use those in that inventory? Unfortunately, people use it the wrong way. You talk about no decision rates.

We've all had no decisions. I've had very few in my career, but people misunderstand it. They think that status quo is the competition, and it's not. As long as you think it is, you're going to run into this time and time again. When a customer says, "We're going to stick with what we have." What they're not saying is that what we're doing is fine. What they're saying is you didn't convince me that there's a better reason, the reason to do something better. A no decision is a loss. Full stop. We're an offer. The buyer made the decision to not buy. Sellers and managers have to adopt that instead of saying, "Moral victory, there's no decision.”

A no decision is a loss, full stop. The buyer made the decision to not buy.

It didn't go to the competition.

It's like, bulls***, right? You lost because you didn't do a good enough job of helping define where it is they should go and how to get there and make the compelling business case to do that.

Andy, first of all, completely agrees. Secondly, I influenced you to get back into the game. I'm going to take full credit for that from that lunch in New York eighteen months ago. I'm so excited to hear you're working on another book. Team, by the way, we referenced a few times, but Andy's books include Amp Up Your Sales, Zero Time Selling, and one of my favorite books, by the way, that has the best title ever. This is the best sales book title ever. Sell Without Selling Out.

There is no better title ever than that book. By the way, it's also one of my favorite books. It reminds me of the Michael Bungay Stanier book, The Coaching Habit. Great read, easy read, easy to go back to. My books are always dog-eared and highlighted. I still like holding books and highlighting them. The links to all those books are going to be in the episode here, and you and I, as usual, could keep talking for another hour.

I'm surprised it's been almost an hour already.

It's just unbelievable. How do people get in touch with you when they inevitably want to learn more? How do they get in touch with you or follow your best thoughts?

The Future Of Selling In The Age Of AI

As I said, I've taken a bit of a pause. Not a lot of new content on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is probably the best place to message me if you want to connect with me. My website's a little out of action at the moment. Go to my LinkedIn page and message me there if you want to. You can message me at Andy@AndyPaul.com. Those are the best two ways to connect.

Listen, by the way, sabbaticals work. Look at the energy, the enthusiasm, the focus. It's like you never missed a beat. A little break is a great thing. We should all be so lucky.

As I told you when we had spoken a couple weeks ago, it's like, part of it was I looked at and said, "I've been gone for a year, and you guys still have not learned anything." I cannot. Do not be accountable for all of that. I'm trying to fix my little piece here. Just the things that have been a problem prior to every heavy adoption of AI are still a problem. If we're fundamentally doing the wrong things, AI is not going to fix it. If we're so focused on pushing and persuading people to buy our products, and we're just going to use AI to amplify those motions, our win rates are not going to get better.

If we're fundamentally doing the wrong things, AI is not going to fix it. If we're so focused on pushing and persuading people to buy our products, our win rates aren't going to get better.

We're going to find ourselves in a situation where, if the win rates continue to be low, why do they need you at all? If you can only win one out of every five deals, the machine can do that. We do not need you for that. Sellers are digging themselves a hole. There is research that Gartner put out that said, “Look, in 2022, everyone will be self-service.” They said in 2030, I think 75% of B2B buyers predicted that they'd want a human involved, that they would not want a pure AI interaction. That mirrors other research in other fields.

Trust in AI only goes so far, and we all have good reason not to trust it or to be completely trusting, let's say. There's a role for humans that I've always advocated. That role of that selling's become more human, not less. It's certainly successful selling. You have to continue to think for yourself. You can be creative and innovative. Use the tools to provide you with ideas and ways to think more broadly. That's one of the beauties of AI. I use it for that, but there's still a big role for humans if we're doing the right things. Again, what would be the focus of this book is just, yeah, these are things that real sellers have been doing. The working title of the book is Real Selling.

Great title.

It presupposes that something is not real. I believe that people who are selling with low win rates, that's not real selling. That's unreal selling. It has no value to them really and no value to their customers. Let's change that. There are a lot of things to change. You can pick just a few and start, and they'll make such a qualitative difference and a substantive difference in your enjoyment of the process and the buyer's experience with you. At the end of the day, as long as the human's involved, the buyer's experience with that human is going to be the primary reason that they make their decision.

I completely agree. Listen, we're going to hear lots more about that. Folks, we've got something exciting coming. We'll share more in the coming weeks. Andy, just a great discussion again. As always, I learned something when I'm chatting with you, and it's super fun. Thank you. We didn't even get a chance to talk about the World Cup. Next time.

Spain won.

Spoiler alert, if you recorded these games.

I have all this more free time in my day now because I'm on schedule and watch all these matches. Now the Tour de France is taking up a lot of it. That's ending soon too. I can be more productive again shortly.

Actually, we've had a couple of guests too who got the chance to win the lottery to do the legs of the tour. Punishing. The elevation on some of those legs. Just punishing.

I'm doing some of those on my Zwift.

How fun.

It's not. The scenery is not quite as good in my room as opposed to being outside the Alps. Still fun.

Andy, thanks again. We'll be chatting soon.

Thank you very much.

Team, thank you. As always, thanks for joining the show. We run this show to try and improve the performance and professionalism of B2B sales because we think that, in doing so, we actually improve the lives of everybody in sales. Thanks for tuning in to the show. If you like this episode, by the way, please like and subscribe to the show because that's actually how we get great guests like Andy to join.

If there are ideas you have for the podcast that can help us make this better, we love constructive criticism. My email is MarkCox@InTheFunnel.com, personal email. I respond personally to every bit of constructive criticism, saying thank you first. By the way, the way we run the podcast now is a function of some of the feedback you've given us already. Thanks for joining. We'll see you next time on the show. Take care, everybody.

Important Links

About Andy Paul

The Selling Well Podcast | Andy Paul | Win Rates

Andy is the author of three Amazon best-selling books on B2B selling: 

  • Sell Without Selling Out: A Guide To Success On Your Own Terms 

  • Amp Up Your Sales: Powerful Strategies That Move Customers To Make Fast, Favorable Decisions; and, 

  • Zero-Time Selling: 10 Essential Steps to Accelerate Every Company’s Sales. 

He previously was the creator and host of two top-rated sales podcasts, The WIn Rate Podcast and Sales Enablement with Andy Paul. With more than 1,200 episodes produced and millions downloads, Andy’s podcasts remain a go-to resource for sales leaders and top sales producers. 

Dealing With The Root Issues Of Sales Management With Frank Cespedes

The Selling Well Podcast | Frank Cespedes | Sales Management

When a company is not growing, it is not only because of the shortcomings of its sales team. Sometimes, your entire sales management is unaligned with the strategies your salespeople are executing. Mark Cox sits down with Frank Cespedes, a senior lecturer at Harvard University and the author of six fantastic books, who explains how to realign your sales goals with your team goals. He also explores how self-directed omnichannel buying impacts B2B sales today, as well as how AI can be used to increase sales performance and productivity in today’s fast-paced world.

---

Watch the episode here

Listen to the podcast here

Dealing With The Root Issues Of Sales Management With Frank Cespedes

A couple of years ago, my lovely wife asked me, “What do you want to do for your birthday?” My response was, “I want to go to Harvard and sit in on an MBA class being taught by Frank Cespedes.” That's exactly what the two of us did. Frank had provided us a gracious offer for the two of us to sit in on one of his MBA classes in marketing. In this episode, you're going to understand why I picked that as my birthday treat because we have a great conversation with Frank.

Friends of the show know Frank Cespedes as a Senior Lecturer at Harvard University and the author of six fantastic books. Two of my favorites are Aligning Strategy and Sales back in 2014, and in 2021, Sales Management That Works. Those are amazing books. Frank also consults on the boards of some of the largest companies in the world. He has deep expertise in terms of sales, marketing, and business.

We had a fantastic conversation. We talked about a few things. First of all, Frank has always gone against the grain of that sales assumption that when a company's not growing, it's the sales rep's issue or sales rep performance. He's always had a perspective that oftentimes, it's the strategy or the management that's misaligned. It's not at the sales rep level. We talk a little bit about what he's seeing out there.

We then get into what buyers are facing. Complex, self-directed, omnichannel buying is having an impact on B2B sales. We do talk a little bit about what a salesperson needs to become. How do they help that buyer navigate that complex journey? We talk a little bit about AI, given what's taking place, and because we're joined by our AI Sherpa, Mike Sparling, who always adds enormous value.

We had a couple of great conversations. Where are we seeing AI impact companies? Frank's on the board of some of the largest companies out there, so he's seeing the real impact of AI. We talk about whether it is transformative yet or it is still relatively early days. We talk about the 4 or 5 areas where companies are leveraging AI to sell better and increase performance and productivity.

As always, we get into the attributes of B2B salespeople. What are we looking for when we're trying to hire great B2B sales people? We talk a little bit about why this is a great career to jump into, or what has to be true for it to be a great career for you. If you're a young person thinking about investing your career, why would you invest in discipline B2B sales? As always, the conversation is amazing with Frank and Mike. I enjoy talking to these guys. I'm sure you will, too. You'll enjoy this episode. If you do, please like and subscribe to the show because that's how we get great guests, like Frank Cespedes. Enjoy.

The Selling Well Podcast | Frank Cespedes | Sales Management

Welcome to the show. Frank, it's great to see you again.

My pleasure. As always, it is good to see you.

As always with this string of episodes, we're joined by our AI Sherpa, Mike Sparling from MHS. Mike, how are things with you?

Things are very good. I’m looking forward to spring and summer and a great chat with Frank.

Frank, I have to ask this question. I know you're up in our neck of the woods in Toronto over the last month or two, working with some clients. How was the visit up here?

Good. It wasn't actually in Toronto. It was about an hour and a half outside Toronto. It was Elora, Ontario, which was a charming place. The interesting thing, to me, is the weather there was about, that day, 15 to 20 degrees warmer than it was in Boston, so I'll take it.

I'm sure tons of value for the client you were working with there. Frank, like people in Boston and New York, if you're from Toronto, everything within three hours of Toronto in my view is Toronto. I'm sure the people in Elora are delighted to hear me say that. I’m glad it went well. This is always a red-letter day on the show when we have our friend Frank Cespedes back.

Addressing One Of The Biggest Assumptions In Sales

Frank, we'll start at the highest levels here with a couple of questions. I know you've been doing some great publishing with HBR articles. One of the things you constantly challenge in all of your writings, which I love, and two of my favorite books ever are yours. You challenge one of these big assumptions in sales. Frankly, this totally aligns, Frank, with a lot of the clients when they come to us the first time.

A lot of times, CEOs come to us, and they say, “We have a growth problem. We think it's a sales rep performance problem. Mark, we need you to come in. We need the funnel to train 150 salespeople.” We're quick to come back and say, “It's fantastic. We love to work with you. Let's go back to your core sales playbook. Let's think about your sales strategy.” That's one of your themes. You always come back to this. Maybe growth is a rep problem, but it's likely a strategy and a management problem. You've been talking about this for years. Tell us a little bit about what you're seeing out there on the boards you sit on and the clients you consult with.

First, let me reiterate the basic point. In any business, profitable growth is an organizational outcome. It depends on the skills, capabilities, and motivation of your customer contact people or salespeople, but it also depends on product, price, service, and especially strategy. A direct answer to your question, Mark, of what I am seeing is I'm still seeing a confusion and a disconnect between those larger systems, especially strategy and sales.

Frankly, for many of the same reasons, which are fundamentally management reasons, that I outlined in some of those publications, one of the dirty secrets about many businesses is that they do not have a business strategy. They may have a mission, a vision, or purpose. Everybody has got a purpose statement. Those things are useful, but they are not the same as a business strategy. Many executives still confuse them.

The typical planning process in many companies takes weeks, sometimes months. Meanwhile, sales has to respond in market time. Not planning time. Even if what comes out of the planning process is a great strategy, which is a big if. It's often irrelevant to the people in sales. Then, compensation. If you look at sales compensation plans, most of them are based sheerly on top line volume, not the profitability of the sale and the cost to serve. For many salespeople, there is no such thing as a bad customer. If you've got a strategy, there are no bad customers.

Having said that, let me also say that what I see in the past couple of years is that sales is increasingly productive in more businesses. The reason is due to the data revolution, AI, which Mike will get into. Also, there is a big secular change in the cost structures of many businesses. They're increasingly driven by software. That's a high fix cost. Once you get beyond those product development R&D costs, much of the ongoing operating expenses are go-to-market costs. Companies recognize that, and they begin to pay more attention to sales. In general, it has made sales more productive. It has made sales managers' lives more uncomfortable, but as they say in the gangster movies, they chose this life.

There is a big secular change in the cost structure of many businesses because of new software.

Improving Productivity In Professional Sales

It's a great thing to touch on. Team, so you've got it, and we reference it all the time, one of our favorite books of all time is Sales Management That Works: How to Sell in a World That Never Stops Changing. One of the things I got to touch on right off the bat and have attention to jump on, Frank, is that it's so great to hear you say sales is improving productivity or it’s improving in terms of performance.

We have a lot of authors on this show. God bless, but I understand you write a book, and the first thing you're picking at are faults, oftentimes. Our brains are wired to find faults. We're in the same boat. I see a lot of amazing things happening out there in B2B sales where it's almost evolving to management consulting.

First of all, Mike, I'd like your thoughts on that, too. Sometimes, you get to see sales as somebody who's adjacent to it. What are you seeing? Frank, I'd like to push on what are the other things that we're seeing that are working out there within professional sales. I'd love to focus on those for the audience. Mike, your thoughts?

We've had a few different guests. Frank is calling out the core nugget of a theme we've seen for a while, which is that professional sales is becoming more management consulting rather than outcome-driven. It comes from broader solutions, more complex product that's being sold, service and product mix, and the pieces there.

I resonated with your opening, Frank, around the notion of business strategy and the accelerating pace. When I started my career, we could do a 5-year plan and be pretty good at hitting things 2 to 3 years out. With the pace of change, the data, the AI, the digital and global markets, and the different drivers that are at play.

It's hard to know 6 weeks out, let alone 6 months, let alone put a document together with a 12-month horizon. I’m curious. Through the next set of conversations, we can hone in on your experiences with how quickly people are reprioritizing and what the organizational strategies are to reset business strategy as you go forward, given the pace of change and velocity.

Thanks, Mike. We're going to come back to the strategy side of things. Trying to build on what's working out there, we hear all the same information about how buyers are pursuing their journeys on their own. It's getting more difficult to make decisions inside large corporations. They've got complex buying groups. They've got omni-channel research before they engage with salespeople.

What are you seeing top salespeople do, Frank? What are they doing well to try and navigate some of these new realities where the buyers are so well-educated and doing so much work? The buyers, in some cases, have a tough time making decisions. We saw, back in the day, in 2017, the Gartner Buyer's Journey, which you weighed in on. You helped them with what's known as the Spaghetti Diagram. What do buyers do in terms of making a decision? What are great salespeople doing to try to navigate that with their buyers? What are they doing well?

I don't know the right word, Mark, but trends and developments, I think they're all true. It is an omnichannel buying world. Buying units in B2B sales is more complex than they were. The pandemic hollowed out many middle management jobs, so you've got more top executives increasingly busy and you've got to get access to.

The fundamental issue is that we are in a very information-rich world. That gets me into what I think effective B2B salespeople and sales organizations are doing. They’re in an information-rich world where the buyer can get lots of information. There is an important curatorial role for salespeople. We can call that consulting, solutions, or asparagus. I don't care. A knowledgeable salesperson who can help the buyer navigate through that avalanche of information is as valuable as ever.

The second thing is to recognize a basic about B2B buying. Most products and services are components in a wider usage system for the customer. I'll use some of the classic sales jargon. Even when you have a champion in the customer, the reality in most companies is that the champion has to “argue” with their colleagues for their fair share of a limited budget.

That's an economic discussion. It is also a political discussion and an emotional discussion. It's naive to think that most of those buyers are going to navigate that complexity simply with AI or a bot. A knowledgeable salesperson helps. Here is the third issue. I'll add this to the trends because the academic research about this is pretty definitive. Do you know what we used to call the 80/20 rule?

Yes. The Pareto Principle.

That sounds fancier. It's remarkably common. A minority of our customers generate the majority of our sales and profits. What the research indicates is that in the last couple of years, those bigger customers have gotten bigger as a proportion of many companies' sales. What does that tell you? It tells you that account management is even more important than it ever was. Those are the things that I see going on that do or don't make a B2B salesperson effective. There is a role for training there, but training doesn't cure everything.

Attributes Of Great Salespeople

We're going to debate that aggressively before the end of the episode because I like a new house, Frank, and it comes from training. Let's get back to that. Let's park that for the time being. You bring up such a great point. With our limited experience, we don't have a sample size of 10,000 clients, but the consultant clients we have, they become the penultimate example of the Pareto Principle. It's not 80/20. It’s 90/10

 That's exactly right.

You start to get into these things like key account plans and key account management strategies, still navigating levels of business acumen, being so important. I have to understand the industry and the client I'm working with to add value and figure out how we can help them achieve those desired outcomes. I'd like to talk a little more about that. Maybe we'll push on this a little bit before we get back to sales management. You did identify sales management as a tough thing, but that B2B sales role.

I don't like these broad definitions, but you’ve got an account manager and a salesperson. They're bleeding into each other a lot. You've got somebody who's got to add value to the market. In our book, we talked about hiring traits because we still see so many people having a tough time hiring B2B salespeople. We like intelligence, drive, humility, passion, and optimism.

What are the attributes you're seeing out there? What would you add to that list if we've got sales leaders out there building their team? In which they are. A third of salespeople still seem to be churning every year. What should we be hiring to take our businesses into the future with great salespeople?

Quite honestly, Mark, I'm not sure I would change very much. You've been, in an admirable way, beating this drum for years. Your fundamental message about the key criteria in hiring remains relevant. One of the things that I do see, and we'll get into this with AI increasingly, especially in the last few years, is I'll get calls from companies who say, “How do we hire salespeople with AI skills?” My comment is that it's a little bit like running a telemarketing center many years ago and saying, “I better hire people who know how to use the phone.” You hire people who know how to sell. Those are the criteria that you outline. That remains very important.

Hire people who know how to sell.

Having said this, there have always been challenges in hiring and sales that don't exist to the same extent as other functions. If you want to hire a programmer or someone in finance or accounting, you can go to a school and find people who major in the subject. That is rarely true in sales, but that hasn't changed. I don't think AI has changed that. You hire the folks that have the kinds of attributes, temperaments, and skills that you, Mark, have talked about, and then you enable them with the various tools and training that are available.

Frank, the skills we want to spike a little more on that we may not have in the past would be intellectual curiosity, passion for change, resilience, and collaboration. Especially as we see more agentic AI taking place where more things are being done as opposed to answers being created in response. That's going to require a real sense of even individuals having greater collaborative skills, so they can appreciate these digital teammates, some of the more “organic” teammates. It does change team dynamics a lot. The lone wolf no longer has a shot at making the kinds of successes they may have been able to make in the past.

First of all, I agree with you about the increasing importance of collaboration. When the customer has a problem, they call up the person who sold them the product or service. Sales then needs to go back to their companies and navigate across functions. That has become more important over the last couple of years because of the nature of products and so forth. AI will be one more thing. I agree with that.

When it comes to resilience, I have been amazed throughout my balding career at how many salespeople I meet who don't like to make cold calls. My response there is pretty blunt. If you don't like to make cold calls, become a plumber. Do something else. You chose the wrong line of work. That form of resilience, the ability to deal with rejections, has always been true or remains true.

I tie that oftentimes into optimism. We're going to talk about sales management in a few minutes here. One of the reasons we need effective sales management is that you're going to be working with salespeople. They have to be optimistic. They do have rose-colored glasses on their pipeline. They’re like, “I'm going to win more than I'm going to lose or things are going to go my way.”

First of all, you don't want to take that out of the salesperson. That's a survival mechanism to be in this profession. I need somebody who thinks that way, but I also need a sober set of eyes working with them to help them analyze and make sure we don't skip over sales strategy before getting a deal done by making too many assumptions that things are going to go my way.

I agree with you. In sales, it's very important to see that the glass is always half full. That said, the way you operationalize those eyes, and this is not fancy, is lead qualification criteria. That's an area where I see AI beginning to make an impact.

Do you? With the folks we work with, that continues to be tied into two of the biggest issues with companies we work with. One, believe it or not, guys, is the problem with CRM systems. They're too noisy. There's too much fluff in CRM. Executive management teams are trying to use this. Boards are trying to use it. They're not that effective because there's too much garbage in there that's not real at the core. It's because basic deal qualification is still a problem with most organizations.

You need that deal qualification at multiple levels. You need the sales manager to have a set of eyes, the first-line management, but then the VP of sales has to have a set of eyes on the sales manager, and so on and so forth. It’s not to talk us out of winning deals, but to make sure we're discussing reality instead of Shangri-La.

One thing to touch on before I lose it is, Frank, this might be a bit problematic, but why don't we teach B2B sales at Harvard and give somebody a degree in B2B sales? Why isn't this a formal profession like every other profession where there is a degree, you've got to be certified, and you need ongoing training to stay current? Do you ever see us getting to that point? I know about 1/5 of MBA schools teach sales courses. I know it's growing a little bit. What are your thoughts on that? You've seen this for a long time.

Harvard doesn't need me to defend them, but we do teach B2B sales at Harvard. I taught that course for years. We don't give a degree in it. We give an MBA general management degree. Why don't more schools do this? Fundamentally, it's a supply-side problem. If you look at PhD programs in marketing, for example. You're hardly ever going to see B2B at all. They're almost all consumer-based.

The way you make your bones as an academic in academic journals is by analyzing big databases. Historically, that was fundamentally consumer goods companies. Due to the data revolution, more B2B companies are there, but the issue is on the supply side. I want to be a little more provocative and maybe dissent. I'm not sure it would be a good idea for schools to institutionalize training in this area and grant degrees.

You know the old saying about the Military how they're always fighting the last war. The same is true in academia. If you get back to what we've already been discussing and look at the pace of change, it'll be a little bit like what universities have done with coding. What we heard for years was, “Your son and daughter better learn how to code.” Guess what AI is doing to those jobs? The same thing will happen in sales. This is an area where you may not want to entrust the future to the university, if I can be blunt.

Of all the conversations we've had on this, no one's ever taken that approach. We've had this conversation a lot on the show. It makes sense. It’s changing so quickly. In the commercial world, it's industry that's got to lead the way. When I originally fell into this profession, industry did its own sales training to a certain extent. It was a handful of companies you'd get started with, and they taught you how to sell, whether it was IBM or Xerox. I'm dating myself here, but you did get your ticket stamped in B2B sales if you could say you came from one of those companies. I don't see that in industry.

There were reasons for that, but one of them is a bad reason. If you look at hiring in sales, what I have seen again and again is this perception that there's a trade-off. It’s like, “I need to hire the experienced person from company A in my industry because then I don't have to spend time and money training and developing them.” That is an illusion. There is no such thing in sales as performance in the abstract. There's only performance in our company with our products, our prices, and our customers. That trade-off is missing, but that perception is very common.

Let's be a little more optimistic. First, I want to agree with you. I have met guys and gals like you throughout my career. They got their training, wherever it was, whether it was GE, HP, then they went everywhere. There may still be some of those incubators out there, but we don't recognize them until after they've reached their peak.

Hindsight.

It's a much fairer point. I have a little insight in terms of a couple of large ones that I thought would have picked up the mantle. What I've seen there, I wouldn't showcase the same. That's a much more gracious way of looking at it. If you don't mind, given the time here, maybe we change directions a little bit. I'll touch first on sales management, and then I want to talk about AI because it's one of the things everybody's asking us about all the time.

Sales Management That Works is one of my favorite books of all time for a good reason. It is the MBA in sales management. If you haven't read that book out there, you should. Let's talk about that role, Frank, and what you're seeing with the leaders out there. You said it’s a pretty challenging role because of high expectations.

The scorecard is black and white, too. You either hit your number or you didn't hit your number. You get a much tougher grade than anybody else on the executive leadership team. How we're measuring the head of HR and the head of operations is a little vague sometimes, but how we measure the chief revenue officer is black and white. Tell me a little bit about what you're seeing out there. Are you seeing sales leaders manage the way they always have? Are you seeing them trying to leverage these things like big data and AI and change the whole infrastructure and the way they lead the teams?

I see some of both. If I address the question of what some of the effective sales organizations are doing, ironically, one thing those sales leaders are doing is doubling down on the basics and instigating a continuous improvement cycle in those areas that I call the basics. Technology is helping them do this. Who is and who is not our target market or ideal customer profile, to use the jargon?

They’re clarifying and then training our people in our value proposition, not some generic methodology, and looking at our comp system. Whether we have incentives that support rather than contradict our pricing. Last but certainly not least, they’re improving in doing good and regular performance reviews and account reviews. They're motivated to do this because of what you said. The data revolution makes sales more transparent.

The data revolution makes sales more transparent.

A lot of this data flows up to the finance function, the CFO. They're very annoying people. Once they get data, they start to ask questions. They may or may not know anything about the realities of sales, but they've got the data. Sales leaders must respond. That's increasing the requirements for financial literacy. What they're finding with AI in particular is that AI does not repeal the IT law of garbage in, garbage out. You've already made this point. CRM is noisy. They're beginning to clean that up.

My last comment here is about the transformation. That I see going much more slowly than one would predict. The reason is not the technology. The reason is not AI or the AI tools. The reason is, A) The data, B) Fragmented siloed legacy IT systems, and C) If you want to use AI beyond ad hoc use cases. You've got to clarify and change your workflows.

All of those things, cleaning up the data and legacy systems work, are not things you take care of in 2 or 3 weeks. That's what is holding back so-called transformation. The fundamental issue there is change management, which is never easy in sales precisely because sales has to make the numbers every month, every quarter, every year.

Learning The Ropes Of Data Management

How well said. I want to touch on AI, Mike, and get your opinion on what you're seeing in terms of this transformation. Those three things, the data, the silos, and the making sure you've got your playbook because AI can't accelerate performance unless you have your full sales playbook down, Mike and I talk a lot about this, Frank. Let me pass it to you, Mike. What are your thoughts? What are you seeing out there first before I jump in?

Frank is spot on. One thing I've seen a lot of research on says that we've left the age of pilot. The CEOs, chief revenue officers, people reporting to boards, or the evil CFOs, as Frank put it, are not going to get rewarded for a pilot anymore. The expectation is that we're converting the investment into outcome. Yet, exactly the point with garbage in, garbage out or the CRM noise, getting the data to a place it can be consumed. Getting the infrastructure to a place where automation can play, and fitting in the regulatory and compliance framework such that the actions being taken are compliant with what the company wants to execute.

The Selling Well Podcast | Frank Cespedes | Sales Management

Sales Management: AI cannot substitute a flawed playbook or the lack of a coherent sales model.

People have to always remember that you are not able to transfer liability or responsibility to an AI or an AI vendor. What you put out there driven by AI inference or decisioning is your responsibility still as the organization. Understanding the liability, regulatory, and compliance envelope at something moving at the speed of light is much harder than bringing the reps together, sharing lunch, and talking about, “How are we going to remain compliant or this new law requirement has come in or this new system now needs to be updated.”

Frank, you're exactly right. That data accessibility and workflow redesign coupled with the fact back to our opening comments together, strategy doesn't have a lifespan much longer than lettuce or eggs. Where we put that together and the cycle times are causing a lot of churns in all industries. As Mark and I have talked often, sales is that tip.

It’s that point of engagement where the customer, the company, its products, its messaging, and its outcomes come together first through the sales channel. That means that all of this automation potential, but also expectation and investment, are justified in this space first. That's very heady and also challenging for the industry.

I agree with that, Mike. What I do think is different about AI is if you compare what's going on in sales with AI to X years ago when CRM was relatively new, or before that, if you're old enough to remember re-engineering. With those things, many people in the company, especially salespeople, resisted those changes. With AI, I see exactly the opposite. Everybody's eager to get on board.

They play with ChatGPT to say, “Look what this sucker can do.” This is your point, Mike, about what you can outsource. Ironically, the biggest mistake I see is the belief and attempt that, somehow, AI can substitute for a flawed playbook or the lack of a coherent sales model or strategy. It can't. It's a tool. It is not a miracle drug.

How many times have you got an email and it's full of M dashes or other tells that an AI generated it? But I got one. It was a salesperson doing a reach out. They forgot to clip the little paragraph at the bottom that said, “What would you like to do next? I can make this more personal.” They took it straight out of the chat window and pasted it into the email. Bless their hearts. They were doing it to try and personalize something with some LinkedIn data, but they ignored the other tells. They forgot the most fundamental tombstone at the bottom. You sit there and say, “Now I know what I'm dealing with.”

You're going to develop a relationship with that bot.

One of the great tips I picked up from Mike was he suggested that I start having conversations with AI when I'm commuting. Living and working in Downtown Toronto, I commute. I spend time in a car. He said, “Rather than asking for one answer, have a conversation and see how it might change your way of thinking about something.” It enables me to get a little deeper. To those reading, no matter what ends up coming from this, you have to get a little deeper. It's one of those things. We've got to continue our learning.

The Selling Well Podcast | Frank Cespedes | Sales Management

Frank, to touch on it, you talked about how deal qualification was something that AI could help with a little bit. What would be a couple of other areas if a leader was trying to get started? I'm with you, Frank. I don't see a lot of companies, deep down the pipe, leveraging AI in a meaningful way yet. Although, it is embedded with many of their sales enablement technologies. What are a couple of other areas that you're seeing out there where it is being leveraged to make the sales organization more efficient or effective?

My advice to companies is, don't ignore the low-hanging fruit. Pluck it. The fundamental value proposition at the heart of AI is that these large language models can do many things. If not as good as human beings, it is almost as good, freeing up time for things that human beings can do that the machine can't do. In sales, that's a very big deal.

What does that mean for the low-hanging fruit use cases? Do research about customers. AI was made for this. Establish a cadence of communications, whether it's with email, demos, webinars, etc. A big issue in virtually every sales organization on this planet is accelerating and saving time for reps with the massive reporting requirements that they have so they can get out there.

An application I see more commonly is you feed in your data to the AI, Claude or whatever it is, and say, “These are the kinds of customers that buy from us.” Through iterations, the prompts are, “Who's like this that I'm not calling on?” What I see 80% to 90% of the time with the model simply searching publicly available data is the company gets back useful information, and they almost always say, “My addressable market is bigger than I thought it was.” If you add up the things I mentioned, that is not only a very big productivity increase. It also increases the addressable market because you're making better go-to-market utilization in your organization. Start there. Transformation and the future of humanity with AI, don't worry about that.

That's another episode. We need another hour for that one.

Using AI Tools In The World Of Sales

Can I maybe add one more to your list, Frank, or get your thoughts on it? The other one low-hanging fruit, the power of the machine in a way that was inaccessible before, is it unlocks signal detection and anomaly detection. To Mark's point about having a conversation and asking what you don't know, you bring that data together and say, “Who are other customers that are like this I can reach to? What do I need to do to sell something to Mark? What are these things that I can do which are general trends? What are these signals telling me? What are the anomalies I'm not seeing or should be noticing?”

That pattern-matching cadence of the LLMs is something that historically, you may have gone down to the 9th floor, found a data scientist, gotten in a queue and waited, and got a static report months later. That wasn't all that helpful because everything else had changed. If you're intellectually curious and willing to ask those questions, those patterns that can be surfaced are exceptionally powerful.

The Selling Well Podcast | Frank Cespedes | Sales Management

I agree. On the selling side, the AI is not only very good at what you said, Mike, but what I find remarkable is how it can transform that insight about anomalies into a first draft action plan. A good salesperson or sales manager can deal with it. At the same time, and this is an area of AI that people aren't talking about much yet, but I predict they will. Think about what you said with the anomaly detection and think about what's happening on the customer side as they do the research about products, prices, etc.

I'm on two boards where this is affecting our business. Let's assume that as a seller, you've got 90% customer satisfaction, which is a great net promoter score. What the AI model does is it searches the World Wide Web and brings back to the person doing that search on the customer side everything. In effect, it's weighing one dissatisfied customer as much as the nine satisfied customers.

I know a lot of marketing people around the world because of the boards I'm on. I've called them up, asking, “Are you seeing this?” They’re like, “Yes.” I ask, “What are you doing about it?” The bottom line here is no one yet knows what the heck to do about this. It's a big issue, and we're going to start to hear more of how it's affecting not the selling, but the buying.

That’s very astute.

This is another episode for us. There's another hour on this. With the speed with which things are changing, we'll have to make sure we get you again, Frank, in the next 6 to 9 months if it serves your purposes and is helpful. It's a great conversation. I have one question for you. As we look at the time and wrap up a little bit, what are you most excited about for B2B sales, Frank?

You've had a great line of sight into this for decades, as I have and Mike, but you've seen so much more. What are you super excited about moving forward? Why are sales a great place for a graduate of one of your MBA classes to jump into instead of going into consulting or finance, which is where they're likely going to land?

Mike, do you want to begin or I can?

I'd love to hear your thoughts on it, Frank.

The truth, Mark, is I'm very bullish about the future of B2B sales. With all the issues we've discussed, fundamentally, B2B sales in many companies was a silo, and with the requirements of the market, it is more a route to the general management line of business. That gets me to the advice I give my students, and have for years. Sales is often an excellent career choice and often not. It’s very company-specific.

You know the old phrase the culture eats strategy for breakfast. It's not true. Culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. There are many companies where sales is a great route to doing what you ultimately want to do in business, which is to run a business. Not necessarily start it, but run a line of business and have P&L responsibilities. There are many tech companies where sales is invited out of the room when they discuss pricing because they don't want the children to know their cost structure.

That's always my advice to the students. Choose carefully because, at the end of the day, what you're presumably optimizing for is that larger role. What's the best way to get there? Sometimes, it's sales. Sometimes, it's not. That's what I've seen. In general, in B2B sales, it's more a job where because of the cross-functional requirements that Mike talked about and because you do have to be up to speed on data analytics, it's looking more like a place where we groom some of our future leaders, and it was not for many years.

B2B sales is more than a job. It is also the place where we groom some of our future leaders.

Discussion Wrap-up And Closing Words

Anything to build on there, Mike? What a great thought.

It's a phenomenal observation. There are examples of where sales leadership is taking broader corporate leadership. It's because that understanding of the dynamics of the business is happening closer to the customer than ever before. You have to be a bit of a polymath and be able to be sales, analytics, strategy, and some of the other pieces. A lot of that I would agree 100% with, Frank. That would play to the point I would make, Mark, to your original question. What's the most exciting thing? The ability to personalize at the individual level has never been as strong.

One of the things that working with a consistent AI for outcomes is building that long-term memory. It's very easy for you to say in the car as you're thinking with your AI, Mark, “I want to remember the next time I reach out to Frank, we want to talk about this particular topic.” As long as you come back and say, “We're reaching out to Frank. How do we assemble our current goals, Frank's current research, and personalize the outreach?” the long-term memory will come back and say, “Remember in the car, Mark, you said this is a key point we want to work with. We weave it into the conversation.”

That customization and personalization is already at a scale, notwithstanding the message I got with the tombstone at the bottom. That ability to truly personalize the individual with long-term memory has probably never been there except in the minds of some of the most disciplined salespeople who have worked before. This opens that discipline to many more people. That, to me, is very exciting.

Well said. We could keep talking for hours, but I have to be respectful of both of your times. We're going to wrap now. First of all, to you both, thank you so much for joining. What a pleasure having this conversation. It's so great to reconnect with both of you.

My pleasure. I welcome it, Mark. It keeps me on my toes.

Thanks, Frank. Thanks, Mike. Team, thank you. We run the show to help improve the performance and professionalism of B2B sales. We think in doing so, we improve the lives of professional salespeople. Thanks for joining. If you liked this episode, please like and subscribe to the show and tell your friends. That's how we get great guests like Mike and Frank Cespedes.

If there are things we can be doing differently, we love constructive criticism. My email is MarkCox@InTheFunnel.com. The way we run the show is a function of some of the feedback you've already provided. Keep it coming. That's my personal email. If you give us some constructive criticism, I personally respond to every piece of feedback. Thanks for sending it. In the meantime, thanks for joining. We'll see you next time.

Important Links

About Frank Cespedes

Frank Cespedes teaches at Harvard Business School and for 12 years was Managing Partner at a professional services firm. He has worked with many companies on go-to-market and strategy issues, and has been a Board member at consumer goods, industrial products, and services firms. He has written for numerous publications including Harvard Business Review, European Business Review, Organization Science, and The Wall Street Journal; and he is the author of six books including Aligning Strategy and Sales which was cited as “the best sales book of the year” (Strategy & Business), “a must read” (Gartner), and “perhaps the best sales book ever” (Forbes). His newest book is Sales Management That Works: How to Sell in a World That Never Stops Changing (Harvard Business Review Press, 2021)

He has also written more than 50 case studies about companies and numerous technical notes on various business topics, including strategy development and implementation, sales and marketing, leadership, pricing, and start-up issues.




The Justin Michael Method: Leveraging Your Sales Superpowers For Your B2B Sales Game

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Improve your sales skills by accessing your Sales Superpowers, combining ancient wisdom with modern strategies. Get ready to learn about “Justin Michael Method” as we have Justin Michael himself for today’s episode. Justin shares his game-changing outbound strategy that has turned sales professionals into true superheroes. Drawing gold nuggets from his book, “"Sales Superpowers: A New Outbound Operating System to Drive Explosive Pipeline Growth”, Justin breaks down the barriers to explosive pipeline growth and unleashing your sales superpowers. It's time to embrace your inner superhero and revolutionize the way you sell. Tune in now!

---

Watch the episode here

Listen to the podcast here

The Justin Michael Method: Leveraging Your Sales Superpowers For Your B2B Sales Game

We got a great episode for you because we're talking with Justin Michael. He's been on the show before because along with Tony Hughes, he authored an amazing book called Tech-Powered Sales: Achieve Superhuman Sales Skill. This book is a bible for the sales tech stack that you need to contemplate to have the right conversation with the right person at the right time. It’s a great read, a great book. Both have been guests on the show.

We're talking about Justin's book called Sales Superpowers: A New Outbound Operating System to Drive Explosive Pipeline Growth. I have talked to a lot of thought leaders in the SDR and BDR space, filling the top of the funnel. I also consider myself a thought leader in that space. We trained hundreds if not thousands, of SDRs.

I always learn something from Justin in this book. It requires reading if you are in that SDR space. Justin is a world record-breaking outbound sales maven who's arguably built the deepest client acquisition model of all time. It's called the Justin Michael Method. We're gonna get into that Justin Michael Method. We're going to talk a lot about mindset, coaching, and approaches to email, voicemail, and telephone. The telephone works. We're going to talk a little bit about sequencing, leadership, and how you get yourself into a position of growth orientation.

It’s an interesting conversation with Justin. He's got lots of communities and sources of value to help you elevate performance. We align with our value system, which is trying to increase the performance and professionalism of B2B sales while improving the lives of salespeople. I enjoyed my chat with Justin. You will too. If you do, please like and subscribe. Here's Justin Michael.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Justin, welcome back to the show. It's great to have you.

It's a pleasure to be back. I'm sitting in my Zen garden. I have a lot of matrix references in my book. I like to beam in from Tokyo in the multiverse.

I've never read a book with the amount of references you've got. You've got matrix references, Dale Carnegie references, and a reference to Chuck Woolery. For those of you who are not 40, Chuck Woolery was a game show host in the ‘70s, ‘80s, and ‘90s. He was dynamite. I have never seen many quick references unless you've read dozens and hundreds of sales books. You never pick up everything. I love those references.

My mentality is being a synthesizer, and it's dangerous to write sales books if you read a lot and you've done a lot of sales because it's easy to fall into a derivation of Sandler, Challenger, or Spin. Like the Elon Musk story, he goes to the government and says, “I want to build rockets.” They said, “Okay.” After several years, he goes, “Where can I get some Molab denim? Where's a mine where I can get some iron?” He starts to deconstruct the rocket, soup the nuts, and build the thing.

It's really dangerous to write sales books.

What I isolated is when you look in the pantheon of sales books, and there are many great ones, the majority, like 98%, assumes there's a customer or a client. We have this, “Let's progress a deal. Let's qualify progress. Close the deal.” When we get to the top of the funnel up here, it gets quiet, and you see things like Jeb Blount’s Fanatical Prospecting, which is a great foundation. You see Grant Cardone’s 10X. You see Jordan Belfort. You see a lot of these confidence volumes and traditional approaches.

Sandler has some great adaptations and methodologies for opening calls and prospecting. I've done some Sandler training in the past. What I wanted to do was embrace the technology revolution at the top funnel because I found that as a technology rep in SaaS companies, my day was sat down in sales navigator. I go into ZoomInfo and look for the phone number and email. I try to dial and catch someone. I try to sequence email and personalize it. I set up the calendars and record my call. It was all this tech stack stuff because I needed to get the customer. The opening is the new closing.

I used to work for LinkedIn, the Empire State Building, and as a sales navigator. There was a day when people were thinking, “Should I pay for that?” Now, it's the Bloomberg terminal. When I write, I put 2,000 people into five documents. I spent about 300 hours over several months. I took a lot of feedback. I had hundreds of coaching sessions during that time because I do executive coaching. Every time someone asked me a question, I put it in there. I got a couple of editors in England to lower the Flesch-Kincade because everyone said, “Tech-powered sales were hard to read.” I made the reading level similar to college or high school.

I found, in my base of 50,000 people, the top three people who understand GPT prompting. This whole ChatGPT engineering of prompting it and stack prompting it and all these different shop prompts. They have blurbs and segments in there. I challenged them. I said, “I don't want this to be technical for now. I want you to write about ChatGPT and LLMs as if we're at GPT-10. What are the universal principles for prompting a machine so it can think like a human, spit out B2B verbiage, and start thinking?” That's the GPT lab that flows through the book, which was Greg Meyer. That was great.

We're going to get established as a bit of a foundation here. Justin mentioned tech-powered sales that he wrote with Tony Hughes. Tony Hughes has been on the show before. He was great, like Justin was. We interviewed both of them to talk about Tech-Powered Sales, a book I loved because there are 6,000 different technologies to help us have the right conversation with the right person at the right time. It's overwhelming even if you dedicated your life to this.

What I found with Tech-Powered Sales was that it was great for categorizing the things I need to think about, and it gave top lists of technologies that we could go and leverage so we don't get overwhelmed by the tech stack. When we talk about Sales Superpowers, let me call it out before we get in here deeply late. The joy of doing our show is we don't have 1,500 episodes. We have 100. I read the books of the people who are on our show. I go after them to join the show. They don't come to us. I go, reach out, and ask them because I'm a fan of their books. I am a fan of this book, Sales Superpower.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

If you are an SDR, BDR, or an account executive where you have to fill your own top-of-the-funnel, which is everybody in the business, you need to read this book. One of the things that's unique about this book is about filling the top of the funnel outside of the depth and experience that Justin had. If you know what you're talking about, you know where his depth and experience came from. I do like the fact, Justin, that you respect some of those core foundational business models and books like Neil Rackham's SPIN Selling and Miller-Heiman’s Strategic Selling. You talk about Sandler.

The truth of it is, and we read 100 sales books a year, 60% of many sales books come back from one of those foundational models. They came from a lot of Dale Carnegie several years before that. That came from ancient Greek wisdom in certain periods of time. In terms of interacting with a human being, it hasn't changed dramatically over time, but you need to capture this with a voice for a new generation. In terms of figuring out what to do, once you understand those things and you can have a great conversation, there's nothing better than this book for an SDR or BDR.

I'm honored by that because I started to realize there are seven areas that humanity uses to develop business. There are 400 million small businesses worldwide that are the engine of the backbone of the global economy. There are a million SDRs in SaaS and tech and eleven million sales reps in software technology.

No one has questioned the call opener for the first 3 to 7 seconds. I have this idea of heuristics. If you take linguistics, which is the syntax, the words, and the way we talk and communicate. Heuristics are shortcuts over the top. I've seen that in David Hoffeld’s book, The Science of Selling. It's a term taken from computer engineering. My brother is an engineer at Google.

What I'm talking about is rather than memorizing a script, a template, or a pattern, you look at the meta of what it means. You tell the joke that's a humor heuristic. You compare another company that's a social-proof heuristic. You could have pain or fear, emotional resonance. You could have brevity. By stitching together the bounding box around communication, it changes the way you communicate. You can take a 22-year-old, and now they can communicate to a 54-year-old exec making seven figures. Now, we have conversational parody. It's a fast way to upskill and get on the same wavelength.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Sales Superpowers: By stitching together the bounding box around communication, it changes the way you communicate.

The way that phone openers have been for several years is the same. It's permission-based. I call you and ask for permission. What I argue in the book and what I did in my methodology is it lowers your status if you ask permission, like, “Could I get 27 seconds of your time?” It works with tone. If you're selling a seven-figure product, you can't tell it in 30 seconds.

Another popular one now is, “You don't know me. I'm reminding you I'm soliciting.” The most famous one is, “Did I catch you at a bad time?” Aaron Ross, who's a friend and mentor, created this. It's popular. It's been fatigued and saturated. They've heard it a lot. It has a Chris Voss mechanic because it's a negative question in that, “Did I catch you at a bad time?” They say, “No.” You're asking for a no rather than a yes, which is a pattern interrupt in a way that comes from Sandler.

I'm quick to attribute everything, but I love Todd Caponi, who did The Transparency Sales and was my first boot camp trainer at Salesforce in Indianapolis when it was ExactTarget. He goes back on his show, The Sales History Podcast, to the origins of Calvin Coolidge having a sales kickoff in 1910. We're constantly exchanging 3% of the markets in the buying window chat homes. Where does that come from? He is like, “People were talking about the small piece of the market in 1890.”

What I've done on the phone with my techniques has been divergent over the last several years. I believe what I've done in email and in one-to-one DMs is post-1993. I have created a Napoleonic asymmetric warfare or pattern interrupt where I'm doing something different from a neuroscience perspective that stands out to the prospect.

Editor's note here for those reading The Science of Selling by David Hoffeld, he's been on the show. If you want to take a look at past episodes, he's been on the show. One of the things you referenced well is we can't take the LinkedIn platitude of an opener and say, “I'm going to apply this across my entire team through automation. It's going to work.” In LinkedIn platitude, you get what you pay for. Secondly, it changes if it works.

If it works well, people scale it and automate it, and it stops working. You have to be nimble enough no different than any super high-end athlete who comes up with a different way of approaching the sport and somebody can defend against it. If they treat it differently, you have to be able to acknowledge, assess, adapt, and change along principles.

That's another thing that I like about your books, Justin. You've been through the wars a little bit, but you do get back to this mindset and principles in terms of we've got to make sure we can add value. We've got to understand business acumen and industry acumen. Get away from pitching. The pitching came from venture capital going into SaaS and scaling up sales teams so fast. They didn't invest in training or the person training. The team had been doing it for several months. Not everybody's sales force can spend that money on it. People got lousy training, and they became bad. Whatever their bad boss was coaching them on, that's what they did. That's why we've got so much churn in professional sales.

In your book, we'll get into some of the detail here, and I want to talk about all these things, email calls, text, and objection handling, but at a higher level again, it seemed like your book this time had a slightly different tone than some of the other ones I've read with you. You are starting with the mindset and you spent quite a bit of time on coaching. You are a coach, but tell me why it had more of a focus on that and where you've got to in that space.

It's metaphysical, but as I've gone on a journey from being stuck at $45,000 per year to buying 31 without a college degree, earning over $100,000, and finally getting to Salesforce and LinkedIn after many rejections and the pursuit of happiness story. I’m making the most calls and taking the toughest gigs like working in call centers in Costa Rica. It's a great country, but where I was managing wasn't the safest location there. I wasn't out on the beaches. It always sounds a lot more glamorous, but I would always take the hardest jobs.

I worked my way up to Salesforce and LinkedIn by dint of experience and merit. I'm self-made and self-taught. What was happening inside my mentality, my mind, and my self-talk rapidly and dramatically changed. We know that your head is trash. What's in your head, whether that's Tony Robbins, Sandler, or any system, “We think I can't do this big deal.” I'm sitting in front of you, trying to close a seven-figure deal with a CFO. It’s not going to happen. They're going to sense it. At a deep level, your identity needs to shift.

One of the big ways that reps can shift is by starting to serve and feeling the service and the joy of transforming a customer's business. I had a lot of signposts. There was this guy at Salesforce, Tom Randall, who was a former NFL player. I sat with him in a blizzard in Chicago during a challenger sales simulation on a break. I said, “What are your favorite books?” He said, “You're overcomplicating it with all the books.” He looked at me and said, “Justin, sit down, look them in the eyes, and say, ‘I'm going to transform your business.”

The reason I emphasize coaching is that you have to coach yourself until you're coached. If you're in this racket for long enough, you'll be coaching teams. You're going to have to motivate others. I've trained and managed hundreds of reps. I've coached a thousand reps and advised 200 teams.” We can go even crazier to Psycho-Cybernetics by Maxwell Maltz, and 5% of your waking reality is your conscious mind, and 95% is subconscious. Some are 80/20. Eighty percent of your success in life is the inner game, and 20% is the outer game.

I'm huge when I coach people on figuring out what's inside the head of my client, what they are thinking, and what the repetition is. We have 70,000 thoughts per day. We're not our thoughts, minds, and bodies. We're the consciousness behind it. From being, we shift identity that changes thinking and that changes doing. We have this ego, and what it does is it create sabotage and holds us in homeostasis at an exact income level. We're making $95,000, and we get promoted to a $150,000 job. Everything goes wrong perfectly. We can be comfortable again. We can never get enough of what we don't need. Our comfort zone brings us back, and we subconsciously self-sabotage us.

People come to me trying to 2 to 5X their income, trying to blow it out, hit President's Club, and make their number. You see this cyclical manifestation. That's why I got into the mindset, positive mental attitude, John Wooten, all the law of attraction, and neo-transcendental stuff. It's medicine for the heart and mind for these kids that are lost, and they're getting rejected all day, and they might quit.

It’s their view of what success is sometimes. That's something a bit of a challenge for the younger generation. I notice many themes in the reading that resonate because all of us battle with this. All of us have some degree of imposter syndrome. No matter what we're doing, we're going to feel it at some point. Justin was referencing. He has this great Venn diagram where he thinks about doing, being, and thinking within the book.

That's an important thing to get this abundance mindset where the universe isn't trying to get you. The universe is providing opportunities for you. Take a pause. It's a bit of meditation or mental preparation. Enjoy what you're doing. That idea of every interaction with a client, a prospect, or a guest on the show. You're of service.

First of all, be curious. Always trying to learn and develop. It sounds like you've read every book out there. Nick Morgan from Harvard talked about us being able to sense somebody else's intent in milliseconds upon meeting them. Having the intent of service, like, “I do want to help you achieve a better business outcome. I do want to help you be successful in your business. I have value that I can add to this conversation. I'm not going to pitch my product. I'm gonna talk about some insight, value, best practices or trends.”

In a genetic sense, you want to know what other clients like you who are running call centers are doing now. I'm not going to tell you specific things, but I'm going to give you some ideas here so you can stay ahead of the curve. That mindset is such a critical one starting off what we do. It's tough to sell. There’s a lot of rejection. We need some mental fortitude. We'll talk about your honey badger, but it's an important one, Justin. I'm glad you started with that in the book, and it's important.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

The 50th Law by 50 Cent and Robert Greene

Take paranoia, and there's this funny word called pronoia, which is to flip it. The universe is plotting to do me good. Take the rapper 50 Cent. He takes nine shots to the face, and he lives. He sees himself, and he goes, “This is a miracle he lives life from that place of a miracle.” Look what he accomplished. He invested in vitamin water from Glaceau and made a fortune. He is a strong businessman. He wrote a book with Robert Green. It's fantastic. It's a street hustler's interpretation of The 48 laws of Power. I love it.

All your weaknesses are your strengths. It's a double-edged sword. I have no college degree, and I've moved up into the top 1% of this industry repeatedly in regards to shedding the profit motive like a skin. We're all taught money focus. I hired him. He's money-focused. That's the goal of the salesperson. The top rep at Salesforce said, “Read The Go-Giver by Bob Burg.” I know Bob. We've all read some of the great books. It's a parable. It's like Og Mandino and The Greatest Salesman in the World or Frank Bettger and How I Raised Myself. You read it, and it's all about paying it forward. The minute I finally got on calls and I didn't want to close the person, the floodgates opened because that little dot, that nanoparticle of blood to the great white shark, was always there. You can't coach people like that. I can't close my coaching clients. I take on the burden of their case. I have to help this person shatter their income ceiling, locate their unique genius, and find shortcuts. I’m like, “I want to get results. I want them to reach a better future in a far better state.”

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

If you create your future from your past, you're forever a victim of your experience. If you create your future from your future, it's a powerful and infinite possibility. That's a quote by Werner Earhart, and I love it. You read pronoia and future from the future over and over in the three books. I'm hammering it into your psyche purposely because I want you to shift from fear and worry and all the external like, “What are the tactics? What are the hacks? Is it Sandler Miller, Heiman, challenger, or SPIN? I'm like, “It's in your head. The fact you're looking outwardly to solve your sales problem is step one.”
  let's get into the rest now. You want to underscore that.

Let's jump into a couple of things. This show is not something that's a replacement for buying and reading the book. Buy and read the book. You'll come back to me and thank me for suggesting you do this. Many of our clients who always read these blogs go and do it. It aligns perfectly with many of the things we teach.

Let's do a bit of a quick round table, Justin, so people get some value out of it in addition to everything else we've covered here. Let's talk about a couple of things. Let's start with the telephone. I can't tell you how often we get brought in to coach organizations where someone's pulled a platitude from LinkedIn that says, “The telephone is dead.” With love, I'll show them why that's not the case. We might do a couple of days worth of telephone prospecting in front of a group of people to show them that it's not dead. Let's talk about some of your approaches on the phone. We're going to talk about email and sequences.

I was greatly honored that Art Sobczak from Smart Calling read this. He gave it a positive review, and He didn't even have to. Thank you, Art, for reading. I'm never saying that what you're doing on the phone won't work. If you have tonality and a strong frame to quote, you can crush it on the phone with almost any script. The issue is a lot of the models are quite predictable.

In 2024, you should be prioritizing the telephone as the tent pole to your strategy. I was part of that research and combo prospecting with Tony Hughes, where if you get an email, call. If someone views your profile, call. If someone comments on something on LinkedIn, call and invest, and you're a manager out there in data, not ZoomInfo, but hitting that against a VA operation to clean the list or working with LeadIQ, there are many different ones because what you want to do is get phone numbers that ring.

In 2024, you should be prioritizing the telephone as the tent poles your strategy.

Connect and sell. Looked at about 10 million phone numbers, and they found that 50% of the meetings were from fully navigated dials. What does that mean? It means that direct sales are not the holy grail. A lot of these folks are still about leaving a voicemail through the switchboard, getting through a gatekeeper, and dialing in through a phone tree. You need to get masterful calling gatekeepers because you need to go to power.

In an organization, it's pyramidal. You go top down, bottom up, and middle out at the same time. Why? It’s because if you call the C levels, they'll freeze you and say, “Leave it with me.” They'll delegate it down to who you sound like. If you try to get groundswell and call low, some small fiefdom will catch you and block you from going up to the CRO.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Sales Superpowers: You need to get masterful calling gatekeepers because you need to go to power in an organization.

What I do is I call up and down the org chart. I gain intel at various levels and take that intel with me up and down until someone stops the cakewalk like the music stops and says, “I'll get an email and say, ‘This is Jane's team. Call off your dog. Stop calling the whole company. Stop sending Venn diagrams to everyone.” That's the why behind calling and the techniques we could get into.

Let's call out while you're on it because you talked about the pyramid, top-down, bottom-up, and flanking. I love this idea of reaching out to salespeople to take calls. If you're trying to get some intel and insight, they'll respond, take an inbound call, and share. There's a karma about that. They're doing down-demand generation. They're willing to lend a hand.

The other great tip, which I didn't know, is when you're on LinkedIn and you see somebody you're reaching out to, on the right-hand side that people also looked for because it may not be somebody you would've logically gone to or flanked in that organization or another organization. Tell us a little bit about that tip. That's an interesting one.

I'm glad that you caught that. That's such a small nuance. It's made companies that I've worked for millions of dollars. Two office giants merged, and I needed to get the chief digital officer. I went to LinkedIn and put people who were also viewed. There was a VP of financial planning and analysis. At that time, I wasn't as smart as now. I thought, “For some reason, it was a hack that whoever knows the person, even if it's a different company, the water cooler is people also viewed now.”

I know that's true because people are turning that off. I called him, and I got through to his cell phone. He picked up and gave the value prop. He's like, “Here's the cell phone. Give him a call.” I called the chief digital officer of a Fortune 100. On his cell, that wasn't available in any database. It was a private cell. I talked to Vern. He didn't respond. I went to my own CEO. She sent a message on LinkedIn and the combination. We ended up on-site in Boca Raton, flying in. This became a multi-hundred thousand dollar deal and was successful.

Another great phone story is that I tried to get to the chief marketing officer of Marriott. It’s not easy. I was reading an article in Wired Magazine, and there was a quote in it. I call this Hyper P in the book Hyper-Personalization. I read about these new apps where you can open your hotel door with the app. We had a geo-fencing technology that was accurate. You could serve different offers at the pool, front desk, and golf course.

I called her phone. I dialed DiscoverOrg, which is now ZoomInfo. It is Friday afternoon, 4:00 PM. I leave a voicemail like, “I saw your quote in Wired to have this technology.” I'm doing a combination of calling voicemail and email. I left a voicemail and sent an email. I put your quote in Wired as the subject line. Within fifteen minutes, she responds, and the loops in London. The next week, I called London. I explain the whole scenario, what the tech is, and how I got to the CMO. I get transferred to Plano, Texas. Within a few weeks, we're on a plane going to Plano, Texas. I'm sitting here using the Justin Michael Method, making this stuff happen. I hadn't codified the method back then. It was routing, multithreading, and doing what it takes to smartly use the phone. 

This is the beauty of it. People who achieve a certain level of proficiency in anything have an open mind to a lot of different things. The top hockey players and trial lawyers in the world are always looking to learn and understand what other people are doing. There are no real absolutes, “Never do this. Don't do this.”

People who achieved a certain level of proficiency in anything have this open mind to a lot of different things.

What I love about that is when you think of your sequences in some sense, you say, “In certain areas and levels, we can use some automation with some basic personalization, but at certain levels, it's got to be hyper-personalization.” As soon as you leverage somebody's quote, they're going to respond. I always call this out, Justin. I'm not cold call. I get a lot of email spam because although I don't do anything in the funnel, I'm listed as a CEO. The hard work gets done by other people, but I'm listed as CEO. I get pounded.

It's easy to get my attention. All you have to do is say, “Mark, when you were talking about value proposition in the second minute of that video, I loved when you said this.” If you say that, “I'm morally obligated to take your call.” It's easy. All I get is, “I get five times a week. We're a sales training company five times a week. I'm going to get an email blasted by another sales training company.” That's what happened.

They don't even look at a website. They have no idea what we do. They've taken a list and are blind. That's the noise that it's easy to stand out from these people if you do some of the things in Sales Superpowers because it's a dynamite book. Let's jump over to email. You talk a lot about, “Let's get away from text. Let's get to images like the Justin Method and Venn diagram.” Tell us a little bit about that.

The whole idea of the Justin Michael method is there's the David Sandler Method, but at the end of the book, I say, “It's the Mark Cox Method.” The goal is to make it your own, disassemble it, and make it a steel alloy without you already using it. I almost called my method the Venn Diagram Selling. I was kicking around 2016 and 2017 in a company called Tune.

There was a chief revenue officer. This guy is Ralph Hurt. He had this 350-page sales kickoff document. I was onboarding. I was like, “This is impressive. This is MBA-level stuff.” Inside it, he has these market breakdowns, full Deloitte style of all these different Venn diagrams. I was taken with them. I thought, “I'm going to send these in emails.” I took one of them. I sent it to the Chief Digital Officer of McDonald's out of my Gmail, and I booked a meeting on the first cent. I was like, “That's crazy.” He immediately looped someone in and had a call.

I sent it to the VP of Home Depot. My cell phone rang, and the guy said, “Pitch me.” He called the phone number in my signature. In several years of prospecting, no one had ever called me back, even off my phone messages. That was the Doc Brown flux capacitor falling and hitting my head on the toilet and inventing time travel. I thought, “Maybe there is something to do with it.”

Over the last several years, I've helped people build thousands of Venn diagrams. I don't know if I can divulge this, but there's this company with about $1 billion in revenue. They have this extremely sophisticated Venn diagram that looks like close encounters of the third kind. I wish I could show it to you. It has these wheels. It looks like a crop circle. They've set 60 opportunities in the enterprise, driving tens of millions in funnel by sending this diagram.

Here's the reason why. Images process 60,000 times faster than words. Ninety percent of what the brain retains is visual. Words don't exist. I thought, “Here's the tombstone. You're going to one of these big cemeteries and there I am.” On the tombstone, it says, “Email is visual. The phone is power transfer.” Email is not about templates because it's about heuristics and images in their mind that are the connotations of the words. If you think of Starbucks, you think of coffee. If you think of the ultimate drawing machine, you think of BMW.

What you're trying to do with words is put an image in their mind. We all know that people hate to be sold and they love to buy. They are triggered emotionally, but they rationalize with logic to close. Those are different sectors of the brain. There are all these, like complicated brain diagrams and books. Oren Klaff has great stuff on the crock brain.

Here's the idea. You have an old brain like the lizard brain, and you've got the neocortex. The problem is, between phone and email, we use the brain wrong. Here's what I mean. When you interrupt a human on the phone, it’s old brain, fight or flight. You need to calm down. That person says their full name. Let them talk, make them safe, and validate them. That's not the reason for my call, not combative, not rebuttals, because they're going to be uninterested. I'm not interested because the old brain is reacting, and the front brain is catching up.

When you email people, you need to trigger the old brain because if you send them all this stuff to the front of their brain that's logical and happy, it never triggers the emotion for them to have a visceral response. Humans are loss-averse and risk-averse. They're not pleasure-seeking. You have to be a merchant of fear.

You have all this reverse engineering. It's like, “Is this even ethical? You play with people's minds, Justin.” I say, “If you sell a product and service that is a 3X our why and you transform their business, and it's good for them, you have to move them out of their comfort zone so they can change. That's the most ethical thing you can do. If you have to use a tactic to get them out of their own way, no one else is going to do it. Help them help themselves.

The way theories of persuasion have been out there for thousands of years. We're all victims of this. We have our mobiles, and 80% of everything we do comes through our mobile. Who doesn't miss the dopamine of scrolling through our mobile? There are smart people who have figured out how we do this they get us connected.

I have a couple of thoughts to throw out, folks. I've referenced this before. I love The Old Lizard Brain, New Brain, Emotion Fact, System One, System Two Thinking, by Daniel Kahneman. We've talked about that book on this show every third episode. It’s the hardest read I've ever read. That's the most difficult book to read I've ever come across. It's hard to capture the 135 cognitive biases because every time you look at one, you think you've got it. How many books do you read a week? You must be reading 3 or 4 books a week. This is insane stuff.

It's funny because when I first got on the phone with Mark Berry, she was like, “Are you an encyclopedia?” I was talking fast, like Mark Andreessen. I've been experimenting with not taking caffeine because David Goggins doesn't take caffeine. I've been doing experiments between the beta-focused state of the brain, states like Theta and Alpha, and the impact of geometrically sacred music like Solfeggio frequencies on the brain to relax and focus on the beats. I've been doing a lot of this stuff.

There was a time when I was on the road for several years when I digested this stuff like candy. I did like what Alex Hormozi said. I would get a pile of books. If it didn't grip me in the first couple of chapters, I abandoned or read a blink of summary.” Stuff like Mastering the Complex Sale by Jeff Thull or The New Power Base Selling, I've read some of these books five times.

I've gone and contacted every single author who would talk to me. These days, I spend more time editing my own writing than even writing. If you look at it with the Justin Michael Method Series, you've got 150,000 words there. I have put out 500,000 words of published writings in the past several years, and I've gotten faster. I also did a book with my co-founder, Julia Nimchinski, called Reinventing Virtual Events, which is a go-to-market book. I don't know if you're aware of it.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Reinventing Virtual Events: How To Turn Ghost Webinars Into Hybrid Go-To-Market Simulations That Drive Explosive Attendance

I'm not, thank you.

That's a cool one if you want to check out my thoughts on marketing.

I know how busy you are and we're going to wrap this up. I got to call out a couple of things. First of all, I'm happy to reconnect with you again. Thank you for taking some time to talk to us. I do love the book Sales Superpowers: A New Outbound Operating System to Drive Explosive Pipeline Growth. It's fantastic content and an interesting read for those of us who enjoy understanding, developing, and trying to take it to the next level. If you've got a growth orientation, this is for you. If you're starting in sales development or business development, this is for you. All of Justin's links will be in the blog. Justin, we have to stay in touch. Thank you so much for joining. It's been such a pleasure having you.

Thanks for having me. I put out some free guides called the Codex Guides. They were put on Reddit by 25,000 people who got them. If you reach out, I'll share them with you. They're immediate heuristics, formulas, and frameworks that you can apply to emails, calls, social selling, visual prospecting, and video.

I'm coaching some amazing teams and individuals and incubating new writings. I was on a call with Aaron Ross. That was great to catch up. I've had a lot of support from the entire writing community. I’m grateful to see how well this book's been doing. The book is selling at the pace of gap selling. I've put out five books, but this one is the one for Sales Superpowers.

Tech Powered Sales is like Iron Man and Jarvis Suit. They interviewed Stan Lee about the Spider-Man character, and it was the most successful even after Superman because it was a real human being that becomes supernatural or extra sensory and gets these superpowers. If you feel average or you're not that good at sales, I get it because I was average. I was making $45,000 at 31 with several years of experience. I managed a 1,000-person team. This is a book for you. You can turn your life around with what's in that book. I would be honored if you leave a review.

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Sales Superpowers: A New Outbound Operating System To Drive Explosive Pipeline Growth (Justin Michael Method)

What's the best way to get ahold of you?

I'm accessible over LinkedIn. Follow Justin Michael. I try to answer everyone if I can and be helpful.

Thank you again, Justin. This is now going to be the last time we are going to talk. Team, thank you so much for joining the show. We run this show because we're intellectually curious about people like Justin and the great work they're doing. We want to increase the performance and professionalism of B2B sales because we believe, that by doing that, we improve the lives of professional salespeople like you.

We also know we're not perfect at running this show. Please send your comments on how we can make this more valuable to you. Keep sending them to me at MarkCox@InTheFunnel.com. We respond to each and every piece of constructive criticism we get. We love constructive criticism. That's how we improve this. You've given us some great ideas. Keep it coming. Other authors you'd like to see on board and other methodologies you'd like to talk about other formats. In the meantime, we're recording this in 2024 in January. I wish everybody an amazing 2024, where you're happy, healthy, and prosperous. You're giving back to the universe that love it shows you. Thanks, everybody.

Important Links

About Justin Michael

The Selling Well Podcast | Justin Michael | Sales Superpowers

Justin Michael is a world-record-breaking, outbound sales maven who has arguably built the deepest client acquisition methodology of all time: the Justin Michael Method (JMM™).

It's driven over $1 billion in pipeline for 200+ startups he's advised and over 25,000 reps, 1,000 of which he's personally coached.

With 20+ years in sales, ex-Salesforce, and LinkedIn, Justin is the global authority on AI-based outbound prospecting alongside legends like Aaron Ross, Josh Braun, and Mark Roberge.

His counterintuitive, mobile-responsive, neuroscience-backed visual prospecting methodology made him a million-dollar earner and helped countless startups scale past $10 million ARR.

His clients frequently 2-5X their pipeline and income, consistently getting promoted within six months. Justin is the bestselling author of "Sales Superpowers" and "Tech-Powered Sales," which proved that over 75% of top funnel can be automated by raising your technology quotient (TQ). He lives in Los Angeles, California, advising top SaaS technology CROs and teams on bleeding-edge revenue models.